Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
VS
Core Ultra 5 135U

Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U vs Core Ultra 5 135U

AMD

Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U

8 Cores16 Thrd15 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2022
VS
Intel

Core Ultra 5 135U

12 Cores14 Thrd0 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2023

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 5 135U

#64
Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
106%
#73
Core i9-13950HX
MSRP: $590|Avg: $199
103%
#77
Core Ultra 5 135U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#82
Core i7-11700B
MSRP: $323|Avg: $311
99%
#83
Core i7-13700HX
MSRP: $485|Avg: N/A
98%
#86
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U leads in gaming performance. However, the Core Ultra 5 135U is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 1.4% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightRyzen 7 PRO 5875UCore Ultra 5 135U
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Cezanne U (Zen 3) (2021−2022) / 7 nm)
✨ Modern (Meteor Lake-P (2023) / 7 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightRyzen 7 PRO 5875UCore Ultra 5 135U
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U and Core Ultra 5 135U

AMD

Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U

The Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Cezanne U (Zen 3) (2021−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 16,666 points. Launch price was $299.

Intel

Core Ultra 5 135U

The Core Ultra 5 135U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-P (2023) architecture. It features 12 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): + 12 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 16,900 points. Launch price was $332.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 135U offers 12 cores / 14 threads — the Core Ultra 5 135U has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U versus 4.4 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 135U — a 2.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U (base: 2 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U uses the Cezanne U (Zen 3) (2021−2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Core Ultra 5 135U uses Meteor Lake-P (2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U scores 16,666 against the Core Ultra 5 135U's 16,900 — a 1.4% lead for the Core Ultra 5 135U. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U vs 12 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 135U.

FeatureRyzen 7 PRO 5875UCore Ultra 5 135U
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
12 / 14+50%
Boost Clock
4.5 GHz+2%
4.4 GHz
Base Clock
2 GHz+25%
1.6 GHz
L3 Cache
16 MB (total)+33%
12 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
2 MB (per core)+300%
Process
7 nm
7 nm
Architecture
Cezanne U (Zen 3) (2021−2022)
Meteor Lake-P (2023)
PassMark
16,666
16,900+1%
Cinebench R23 Multi
9,315
Geekbench 6 Single
1,948
Geekbench 6 Multi
8,000
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U uses the FP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core Ultra 5 135U uses FCBGA2049 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 7 PRO 5875UCore Ultra 5 135U
Socket
FP6
FCBGA2049
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5600
Max RAM Capacity
96 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U) / Yes (Core Ultra 5 135U). The Core Ultra 5 135U includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Graphics), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureRyzen 7 PRO 5875UCore Ultra 5 135U
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel Arc Graphics
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
Yes