Ryzen 9 270
VS
Ryzen 9 7940H

Ryzen 9 270 vs Ryzen 9 7940H

AMD

Ryzen 9 270

8 Cores16 Thrd45 WWMax: 5.2 GHz2025
VS
AMD

Ryzen 9 7940H

8 Cores16 Thrd35 WWMax: 5.2 GHz2023

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Ryzen 9 7940H delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Ryzen 9 270 in both compute-intensive tasks (1.5% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightRyzen 9 270Ryzen 9 7940H
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Hawk Point (2024−2025) / 4 nm)
✨ Modern (Phoenix (2023−2024) / 4 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightRyzen 9 270Ryzen 9 7940H
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 270 and Ryzen 9 7940H

AMD

Ryzen 9 270

The Ryzen 9 270 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 29,602 points. Launch price was $299.

AMD

Ryzen 9 7940H

The Ryzen 9 7940H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600. Passmark benchmark score: 29,151 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen 9 270 and Ryzen 9 7940H share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 9 270 versus 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7940H — identical boost frequencies (base: 4 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Ryzen 9 270 uses the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 9 7940H uses Phoenix (2023−2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 270 scores 29,602 against the Ryzen 9 7940H's 29,151 — a 1.5% lead for the Ryzen 9 270. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,500 vs 17,200 (4.2% advantage for the Ryzen 9 7940H). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,636 vs 2,646, a 0.4% lead for the Ryzen 9 7940H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 13,000 vs 13,495 (3.7% advantage for the Ryzen 9 7940H). Both processors carry 16 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureRyzen 9 270Ryzen 9 7940H
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
8 / 16
Boost Clock
5.2 GHz
5.2 GHz
Base Clock
4 GHz
4 GHz
L3 Cache
16 MB (total)
16 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
1 MB (per core)
Process
4 nm
4 nm
Architecture
Hawk Point (2024−2025)
Phoenix (2023−2024)
PassMark
29,602+2%
29,151
Cinebench R23 Multi
16,500
17,200+4%
Geekbench 6 Single
2,636
2,646
Geekbench 6 Multi
13,000
13,495+4%
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the FP8 socket with PCIe 4.0. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. Both support up to 256 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: FP8 platform (Ryzen 9 270) and FP7,FP7r2,FP8 (Ryzen 9 7940H).

FeatureRyzen 9 270Ryzen 9 7940H
Socket
FP8
FP8
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5600
DDR5-5600
Max RAM Capacity
256 GB
256 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
20
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support AMD-V, SVM virtualization. Both include integrated graphics Radeon 780M (Ryzen 9 270) and Radeon 780M (Ryzen 9 7940H) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 270 targets Professional Content Creation Laptop, Ryzen 9 7940H targets High-performance Gaming Laptop. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 270 rivals Core i9-13900H; Ryzen 9 7940H rivals Core i9-13900H.

FeatureRyzen 9 270Ryzen 9 7940H
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon 780M
Radeon 780M
Unlocked
Yes
Yes
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
AMD-V, SVM
AMD-V, SVM
Target Use
Professional Content Creation Laptop
High-performance Gaming Laptop