Ryzen 9 270 vs Xeon Gold 6248
Ryzen 9 270
Xeon Gold 6248
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Xeon Gold 6248
Why is Ryzen 9 270 better than Xeon Gold 6248?
The comparison between the AMD Ryzen 9 270 and the Intel Xeon Gold 6248 illustrates the contrast between modern high-end mobile efficiency and previous-generation enterprise multi-threading. The Ryzen 9 270 is a 2025 \"Hawk Point\" mobile flagship designed for top-tier laptops, while the Xeon Gold 6248 is a 2019 server processor from the Cascade Lake era.\n\nIn terms of multi-threaded throughput, the Xeon Gold 6248 remains a potent competitor with its 20 cores and 40 threads, making it excellent for legacy server environments and virtualization. However, the Ryzen 9 270 benefits from the much newer Zen 4 architecture, offering significantly higher single-core performance and impressive efficiency for a laptop chip. The Ryzen also supports newer technologies like DDR5 and PCIe 4.0, which provide a more responsive experience in modern applications.\n\nUltimately, the Ryzen 9 270 is the superior choice for high-performance portable gaming and modern mobile workstations. The Xeon Gold 6248 is a specialized industrial tool designed for server stability and massive parallelization, but for almost any user-facing desktop or laptop application today, the much newer Ryzen architecture will feel faster and more efficient.
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Ryzen 9 270 | Xeon Gold 6248 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Hawk Point (2024−2025) / 4 nm) | ✨ Modern (Cascade Lake (2019−2020) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Ryzen 9 270 | Xeon Gold 6248 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 270 and Xeon Gold 6248
Ryzen 9 270
The Ryzen 9 270 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 29,602 points. Launch price was $299.
Xeon Gold 6248
The Xeon Gold 6248 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 27.5 MB. L2 cache: 20 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 29,535 points. Launch price was $3,072.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 270 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6248 offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon Gold 6248 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 9 270 versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6248 — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 270 (base: 4 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Ryzen 9 270 uses the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6248 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 270 scores 29,602 against the Xeon Gold 6248's 29,535 — a 0.2% lead for the Ryzen 9 270. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,500 vs 19,000 (14.1% advantage for the Xeon Gold 6248). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,636 vs 1,327, a 66.1% lead for the Ryzen 9 270 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 13,000 vs 15,277 (16.1% advantage for the Xeon Gold 6248). L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 270 vs 27.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 6248.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 270 | Xeon Gold 6248 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 20 / 40+150% |
| Boost Clock | 5.2 GHz+33% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4 GHz+60% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 27.5 MB+72% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 20 MB+1900% |
| Process | 4 nm-71% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Hawk Point (2024−2025) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 29,602 | 29,535 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16,500 | 19,000+15% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,636+99% | 1,327 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 13,000 | 15,277+18% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 270 uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6248 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 9 270 versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon Gold 6248 — the Ryzen 9 270 supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6248 supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 270) vs 6 (Xeon Gold 6248). PCIe lanes: 20 (Ryzen 9 270) vs 48 (Xeon Gold 6248) — the Xeon Gold 6248 offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FP8 platform (Ryzen 9 270) and C620 (Xeon Gold 6248).
| Feature | Ryzen 9 270 | Xeon Gold 6248 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP8 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600+25% | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB | 1024 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 6+200% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 48+140% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 270 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SVM (Ryzen 9 270) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Gold 6248). The Ryzen 9 270 includes integrated graphics (Radeon 780M), while the Xeon Gold 6248 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 270 targets Professional Content Creation Laptop, Xeon Gold 6248 targets General Purpose Enterprise Server. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 270 rivals Core i9-13900H; Xeon Gold 6248 rivals EPYC 7352.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 270 | Xeon Gold 6248 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon 780M | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Professional Content Creation Laptop | General Purpose Enterprise Server |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen 9 270 and Xeon Gold 6248
