
Ryzen 9 5900X
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 7940H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Why buy it
- ✅+22.1% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (2,174 vs 2,646).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $549 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 7940H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌200% higher power demand at 105W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 7940H moves to FP8 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 7940H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 9 7940H
2023Why buy it
- ✅+21.7% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 105W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Ryzen 9 5900X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (17,200 vs 21,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 64 MB).
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Ryzen 9 7940H
2023Why buy it
- ✅+22.1% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅+21.7% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 105W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Ryzen 9 5900X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (2,174 vs 2,646).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $549 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 7940H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌200% higher power demand at 105W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 7940H moves to FP8 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 7940H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (17,200 vs 21,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 64 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 7940H better than Ryzen 9 5900X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen 9 7940H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 291 FPS | 241 FPS |
| high | 243 FPS | 206 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 307 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 192 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 157 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 193 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 89 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen 9 7940H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 772 FPS | 502 FPS |
| medium | 647 FPS | 417 FPS |
| high | 508 FPS | 360 FPS |
| ultra | 450 FPS | 319 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 619 FPS | 439 FPS |
| medium | 536 FPS | 385 FPS |
| high | 443 FPS | 332 FPS |
| ultra | 364 FPS | 282 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 291 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 267 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 251 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 216 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen 9 7940H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 832 FPS | 729 FPS |
| medium | 645 FPS | 729 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 729 FPS |
| ultra | 459 FPS | 650 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 721 FPS | 729 FPS |
| medium | 565 FPS | 637 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 548 FPS |
| ultra | 407 FPS | 464 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 511 FPS | 534 FPS |
| medium | 421 FPS | 460 FPS |
| high | 374 FPS | 409 FPS |
| ultra | 308 FPS | 344 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen 9 7940H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 974 FPS | 729 FPS |
| medium | 974 FPS | 729 FPS |
| high | 934 FPS | 729 FPS |
| ultra | 826 FPS | 729 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 959 FPS | 729 FPS |
| medium | 843 FPS | 729 FPS |
| high | 726 FPS | 716 FPS |
| ultra | 617 FPS | 631 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 694 FPS | 619 FPS |
| medium | 621 FPS | 553 FPS |
| high | 541 FPS | 496 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 434 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 5900X and Ryzen 9 7940H


Ryzen 9 5900X
Ryzen 9 5900X
The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.


Ryzen 9 7940H
Ryzen 9 7940H
The Ryzen 9 7940H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600. Passmark benchmark score: 29,151 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 5900X packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen 9 7940H offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 9 5900X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X versus 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7940H — a 8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7940H (base: 3.7 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Ryzen 9 5900X uses the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen 9 7940H uses Phoenix (2023−2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 5900X scores 38,955 against the Ryzen 9 7940H's 29,151 — a 28.8% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 21,000 vs 17,200 (19.9% advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,174 vs 2,646, a 19.6% lead for the Ryzen 9 7940H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,888 vs 13,495 (12.7% advantage for the Ryzen 9 7940H). L3 cache: 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900X vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7940H.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen 9 7940H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24+50% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz | 5.2 GHz+8% |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz | 4 GHz+8% |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB+300% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) | Phoenix (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 38,955+34% | 29,151 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 21,000+22% | 17,200 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,174 | 2,646+22% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,888 | 13,495+14% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 5900X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 7940H uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 5900X versus DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 9 7940H — the Ryzen 9 7940H supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 9 7940H supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 9 5900X) vs 20 (Ryzen 9 7940H) — the Ryzen 9 5900X offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 9 5900X) and FP7,FP7r2,FP8 (Ryzen 9 7940H).
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen 9 7940H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-5600+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 256 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24+20% | 20 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen 9 7940H supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900X) vs AMD-V, SVM (Ryzen 9 7940H). The Ryzen 9 7940H includes integrated graphics (Radeon 780M), while the Ryzen 9 5900X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation, Ryzen 9 7940H targets High-performance Gaming Laptop. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K; Ryzen 9 7940H rivals Core i9-13900H.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen 9 7940H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon 780M |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | AMD-V, SVM |
| Target Use | Workstation | High-performance Gaming Laptop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












