
Ryzen 9 5900X
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $549 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌1212.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 8W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS moves to FP7/FP8 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 8W instead of 105W, a 97W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7/FP8 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Ryzen 9 5900X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,000 vs 21,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 64 MB).
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 8W instead of 105W, a 97W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7/FP8 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Ryzen 9 5900X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $549 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌1212.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 8W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS moves to FP7/FP8 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,000 vs 21,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 64 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 5900X better than Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 291 FPS | 243 FPS |
| high | 243 FPS | 204 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 307 FPS | 236 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 192 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 157 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 193 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 92 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 772 FPS | 513 FPS |
| medium | 647 FPS | 421 FPS |
| high | 508 FPS | 363 FPS |
| ultra | 450 FPS | 323 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 619 FPS | 448 FPS |
| medium | 536 FPS | 388 FPS |
| high | 443 FPS | 334 FPS |
| ultra | 364 FPS | 285 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 295 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 267 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 253 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 217 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 832 FPS | 683 FPS |
| medium | 645 FPS | 683 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 647 FPS |
| ultra | 459 FPS | 546 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 721 FPS | 683 FPS |
| medium | 565 FPS | 637 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 541 FPS |
| ultra | 407 FPS | 464 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 511 FPS | 541 FPS |
| medium | 421 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 374 FPS | 419 FPS |
| ultra | 308 FPS | 355 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 974 FPS | 683 FPS |
| medium | 974 FPS | 683 FPS |
| high | 934 FPS | 683 FPS |
| ultra | 826 FPS | 683 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 959 FPS | 683 FPS |
| medium | 843 FPS | 683 FPS |
| high | 726 FPS | 660 FPS |
| ultra | 617 FPS | 573 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 694 FPS | 572 FPS |
| medium | 621 FPS | 511 FPS |
| high | 541 FPS | 457 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 394 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 5900X and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS


Ryzen 9 5900X
Ryzen 9 5900X
The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.


Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
The Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 MB + 16 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 27,318 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 5900X packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 9 5900X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X versus 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS — a 8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS (base: 3.7 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Ryzen 9 5900X uses the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS uses Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 5900X scores 38,955 against the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS's 27,318 — a 35.1% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 21,000 vs 16,000 (27% advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,174 vs 2,605, a 18% lead for the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,888 vs 10,348 (13.9% advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X). L3 cache: 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900X vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24+50% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz | 5.2 GHz+8% |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz | 4 GHz+8% |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB+300% | 16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 8 MB+1500% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) | Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) |
| PassMark | 38,955+43% | 27,318 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 21,000+31% | 16,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,174 | 2,605+20% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,888+15% | 10,348 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 5900X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS uses FP7/FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 5900X versus DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS — the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 9 5900X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 9 5900X) vs 20 (Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS) — the Ryzen 9 5900X offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 9 5900X) and SoC (Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS).
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FP7/FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-5600+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+100% | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24+20% | 20 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900X) vs Yes (Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS). The Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon 780M), while the Ryzen 9 5900X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon 780M |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | Yes |
| Target Use | Workstation | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












