
Ryzen 9 5900X
Popular choices:

Ryzen Embedded R1600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +381.2% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+1500% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $549 MSRP, while Ryzen Embedded R1600 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌320% higher power demand at 105W vs 25W.
Ryzen Embedded R1600
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 105W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,276 vs 38,955).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 64 MB).
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Ryzen Embedded R1600
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +381.2% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+1500% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 105W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $549 MSRP, while Ryzen Embedded R1600 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌320% higher power demand at 105W vs 25W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,276 vs 38,955).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 64 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 5900X better than Ryzen Embedded R1600?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Embedded R1600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 291 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 243 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 307 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 192 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 157 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 193 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 32 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Embedded R1600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 772 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 647 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 508 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 450 FPS | 65 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 619 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 536 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 443 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 364 FPS | 55 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 25 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Embedded R1600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 832 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 645 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 459 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 721 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 565 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 407 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 511 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 421 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 374 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 308 FPS | 82 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Embedded R1600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 974 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 974 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 934 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 826 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 959 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 843 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 726 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 617 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 694 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 621 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 541 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 82 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 5900X and Ryzen Embedded R1600


Ryzen 9 5900X
Ryzen 9 5900X
The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.


Ryzen Embedded R1600
Ryzen Embedded R1600
The Ryzen Embedded R1600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,276 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 5900X packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen Embedded R1600 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Ryzen 9 5900X has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X versus 3.1 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded R1600 — a 43% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X (base: 3.7 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Ryzen 9 5900X uses the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded R1600 uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 5900X scores 38,955 against the Ryzen Embedded R1600's 3,276 — a 169% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X. L3 cache: 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900X vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded R1600.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Embedded R1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24+500% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+55% | 3.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+42% | 2.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB+1500% | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 38,955+1089% | 3,276 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 21,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,174 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,888 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 5900X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Embedded R1600 uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Embedded R1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900X) / not specified (Ryzen Embedded R1600). Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Embedded R1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Workstation | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 9 5900X launched at $549 MSRP, while the Ryzen Embedded R1600 debuted at $0. On MSRP ($549 vs $0), the Ryzen Embedded R1600 is $549 cheaper.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Embedded R1600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $549 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 71.0 | — |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













