
Ryzen 9 5900X
Popular choices:

Ryzen Embedded R2514
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +284.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+1500% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $549 MSRP, while Ryzen Embedded R2514 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌600% higher power demand at 105W vs 15W.
Ryzen Embedded R2514
2022Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 105W, a 90W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (6,731 vs 38,955).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 64 MB).
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Ryzen Embedded R2514
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +284.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+1500% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 105W, a 90W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $549 MSRP, while Ryzen Embedded R2514 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌600% higher power demand at 105W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (6,731 vs 38,955).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 64 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 5900X better than Ryzen Embedded R2514?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Embedded R2514 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 161 FPS |
| medium | 291 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 243 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 307 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 192 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 157 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 193 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Embedded R2514 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 772 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 647 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 508 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 450 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 619 FPS | 102 FPS |
| medium | 536 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 443 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 364 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 76 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 41 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Embedded R2514 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 832 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 645 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 168 FPS |
| ultra | 459 FPS | 168 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 721 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 565 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 168 FPS |
| ultra | 407 FPS | 168 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 511 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 421 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 374 FPS | 168 FPS |
| ultra | 308 FPS | 168 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Embedded R2514 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 974 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 974 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 934 FPS | 168 FPS |
| ultra | 826 FPS | 168 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 959 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 843 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 726 FPS | 168 FPS |
| ultra | 617 FPS | 168 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 694 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 621 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 541 FPS | 168 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 168 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 5900X and Ryzen Embedded R2514


Ryzen 9 5900X
Ryzen 9 5900X
The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.


Ryzen Embedded R2514
Ryzen Embedded R2514
The Ryzen Embedded R2514 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,731 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 5900X packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen Embedded R2514 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Ryzen 9 5900X has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X versus 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded R2514 — a 25.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X (base: 3.7 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Ryzen 9 5900X uses the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded R2514 uses Picasso (2019−2022) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 5900X scores 38,955 against the Ryzen Embedded R2514's 6,731 — a 141.1% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X. L3 cache: 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900X vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded R2514.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Embedded R2514 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24+200% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+30% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+76% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB+1500% | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-42% | 12 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) | Picasso (2019−2022) |
| PassMark | 38,955+479% | 6,731 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 21,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,174 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,888 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 5900X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Embedded R2514 uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Embedded R2514 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900X) / not specified (Ryzen Embedded R2514). Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Embedded R2514 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Workstation | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













