
Ryzen 9 5900X
Popular choices:

Ryzen Embedded V1605B
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +284.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+3100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 2 MB).
- ✅Delivers 58.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 71.0 vs 44.8 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌266% HIGHER MSRP$549 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
- ❌600% higher power demand at 105W vs 15W.
Ryzen Embedded V1605B
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $399 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 105W, a 90W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (6,724 vs 38,955).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 44.8 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Ryzen Embedded V1605B
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +284.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+3100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 2 MB).
- ✅Delivers 58.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 71.0 vs 44.8 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $399 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 105W, a 90W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌266% HIGHER MSRP$549 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
- ❌600% higher power demand at 105W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (6,724 vs 38,955).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 44.8 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 5900X better than Ryzen Embedded V1605B?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Embedded V1605B |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 291 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 243 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 307 FPS | 142 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 192 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 157 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 193 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Embedded V1605B |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 772 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 647 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 508 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 450 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 619 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 536 FPS | 77 FPS |
| high | 443 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 364 FPS | 60 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 34 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Embedded V1605B |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 832 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 645 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 168 FPS |
| ultra | 459 FPS | 168 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 721 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 565 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 168 FPS |
| ultra | 407 FPS | 168 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 511 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 421 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 374 FPS | 168 FPS |
| ultra | 308 FPS | 168 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Embedded V1605B |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 974 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 974 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 934 FPS | 168 FPS |
| ultra | 826 FPS | 168 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 959 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 843 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 726 FPS | 168 FPS |
| ultra | 617 FPS | 168 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 694 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 621 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 541 FPS | 168 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 168 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 5900X and Ryzen Embedded V1605B


Ryzen 9 5900X
Ryzen 9 5900X
The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.


Ryzen Embedded V1605B
Ryzen Embedded V1605B
The Ryzen Embedded V1605B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 February 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 6,724 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 5900X packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen Embedded V1605B offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Ryzen 9 5900X has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X versus 3.6 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V1605B — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X (base: 3.7 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 9 5900X uses the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded V1605B uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 5900X scores 38,955 against the Ryzen Embedded V1605B's 6,724 — a 141.1% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X. L3 cache: 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900X vs 2 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded V1605B.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Embedded V1605B |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24+200% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+33% | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+85% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB+3100% | 2 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 38,955+479% | 6,724 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 21,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,174 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,888 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 5900X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Embedded V1605B uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Embedded V1605B |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900X) / not specified (Ryzen Embedded V1605B). Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Embedded V1605B |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Workstation | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 9 5900X launched at $549 MSRP, while the Ryzen Embedded V1605B debuted at $150. On MSRP ($549 vs $150), the Ryzen Embedded V1605B is $399 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 9 5900X delivers 71.0 pts/$ vs 44.8 pts/$ for the Ryzen Embedded V1605B — making the Ryzen 9 5900X the 45.1% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Embedded V1605B |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $549 | $150-73% |
| Performance per Dollar | 71.0+58% | 44.8 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2018 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













