
Ryzen 9 5900X
Popular choices:

Ryzen Embedded V3C48
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +56.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $549 MSRP, while Ryzen Embedded V3C48 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌133.3% higher power demand at 105W vs 45W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen Embedded V3C48 moves to FP7 and DDR5.
Ryzen Embedded V3C48
2022Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 105W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (20,203 vs 38,955).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 64 MB).
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Ryzen Embedded V3C48
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +56.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 105W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $549 MSRP, while Ryzen Embedded V3C48 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌133.3% higher power demand at 105W vs 45W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen Embedded V3C48 moves to FP7 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (20,203 vs 38,955).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 64 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 5900X better than Ryzen Embedded V3C48?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Embedded V3C48 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 291 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 243 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 307 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 192 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 157 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 193 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Embedded V3C48 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 772 FPS | 331 FPS |
| medium | 647 FPS | 281 FPS |
| high | 508 FPS | 240 FPS |
| ultra | 450 FPS | 196 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 619 FPS | 286 FPS |
| medium | 536 FPS | 251 FPS |
| high | 443 FPS | 217 FPS |
| ultra | 364 FPS | 177 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 206 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 134 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Embedded V3C48 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 832 FPS | 505 FPS |
| medium | 645 FPS | 505 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 505 FPS |
| ultra | 459 FPS | 444 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 721 FPS | 505 FPS |
| medium | 565 FPS | 459 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 416 FPS |
| ultra | 407 FPS | 359 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 511 FPS | 412 FPS |
| medium | 421 FPS | 320 FPS |
| high | 374 FPS | 283 FPS |
| ultra | 308 FPS | 227 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Embedded V3C48 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 974 FPS | 505 FPS |
| medium | 974 FPS | 505 FPS |
| high | 934 FPS | 505 FPS |
| ultra | 826 FPS | 505 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 959 FPS | 505 FPS |
| medium | 843 FPS | 505 FPS |
| high | 726 FPS | 505 FPS |
| ultra | 617 FPS | 461 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 694 FPS | 486 FPS |
| medium | 621 FPS | 435 FPS |
| high | 541 FPS | 391 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 339 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 5900X and Ryzen Embedded V3C48


Ryzen 9 5900X
Ryzen 9 5900X
The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.


Ryzen Embedded V3C48
Ryzen Embedded V3C48
The Ryzen Embedded V3C48 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt (2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 20,203 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 5900X packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen Embedded V3C48 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 9 5900X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X versus 3.8 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V3C48 — a 23.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Ryzen 9 5900X uses the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded V3C48 uses Rembrandt (2022) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 5900X scores 38,955 against the Ryzen Embedded V3C48's 20,203 — a 63.4% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X. L3 cache: 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900X vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded V3C48.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Embedded V3C48 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24+50% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+26% | 3.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+12% | 3.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB+300% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | 6 nm-14% |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) | Rembrandt (2022) |
| PassMark | 38,955+93% | 20,203 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 21,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,174 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,888 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 5900X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Embedded V3C48 uses FP7 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Embedded V3C48 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FP7 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900X) / not specified (Ryzen Embedded V3C48). Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Embedded V3C48 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Workstation | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












