
Ryzen 9 5900X
Popular choices:

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +23.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 83.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 71.0 vs 38.7 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 180W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
2018Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (25,148 vs 38,955).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 38.7 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($649 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ❌71.4% higher power demand at 180W vs 105W.
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +23.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 83.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 71.0 vs 38.7 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 180W, a 75W reduction.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (25,148 vs 38,955).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 38.7 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($649 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ❌71.4% higher power demand at 180W vs 105W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 5900X better than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 291 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 243 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 307 FPS | 155 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 192 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 157 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 193 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 43 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 772 FPS | 485 FPS |
| medium | 647 FPS | 433 FPS |
| high | 508 FPS | 369 FPS |
| ultra | 450 FPS | 328 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 619 FPS | 429 FPS |
| medium | 536 FPS | 388 FPS |
| high | 443 FPS | 332 FPS |
| ultra | 364 FPS | 286 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 248 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 228 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 198 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 832 FPS | 629 FPS |
| medium | 645 FPS | 626 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 566 FPS |
| ultra | 459 FPS | 495 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 721 FPS | 629 FPS |
| medium | 565 FPS | 522 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 458 FPS |
| ultra | 407 FPS | 399 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 511 FPS | 460 FPS |
| medium | 421 FPS | 369 FPS |
| high | 374 FPS | 330 FPS |
| ultra | 308 FPS | 274 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 974 FPS | 629 FPS |
| medium | 974 FPS | 629 FPS |
| high | 934 FPS | 629 FPS |
| ultra | 826 FPS | 626 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 959 FPS | 629 FPS |
| medium | 843 FPS | 629 FPS |
| high | 726 FPS | 563 FPS |
| ultra | 617 FPS | 492 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 694 FPS | 503 FPS |
| medium | 621 FPS | 463 FPS |
| high | 541 FPS | 411 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 361 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 5900X and Ryzen Threadripper 2920X


Ryzen 9 5900X
Ryzen 9 5900X
The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.


Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
The Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the ZEN+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 25,148 points. Launch price was $649.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 9 5900X and Ryzen Threadripper 2920X share an identical 12-core/24-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X — a 11% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Ryzen 9 5900X uses the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X uses ZEN+ (2018−2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 5900X scores 38,955 against the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X's 25,148 — a 43.1% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X. L3 cache: 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900X vs 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24 | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+12% | 4.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+6% | 3.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB+100% | 32 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-42% | 12 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) | ZEN+ (2018−2019) |
| PassMark | 38,955+55% | 25,148 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 21,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,174 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,888 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 5900X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X uses SP3r2 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | SP3r2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900X) / not specified (Ryzen Threadripper 2920X). Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Workstation | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 9 5900X launched at $549 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X debuted at $649. On MSRP ($549 vs $649), the Ryzen 9 5900X is $100 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 9 5900X delivers 71.0 pts/$ vs 38.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X — making the Ryzen 9 5900X the 58.7% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $549-15% | $649 |
| Performance per Dollar | 71.0+83% | 38.7 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2018 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












