
Ryzen 9 5900X
Popular choices:

Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +21.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $750 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $1,299 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 197.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 71.0 vs 23.8 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $1,299 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 250W, a 145W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (21,000 vs 29,045).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
2018Why buy it
- ✅+38.3% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 23.8 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($1,299 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ❌138.1% higher power demand at 250W vs 105W.
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +21.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $750 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $1,299 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 197.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 71.0 vs 23.8 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $1,299 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 250W, a 145W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+38.3% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (21,000 vs 29,045).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 23.8 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($1,299 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ❌138.1% higher power demand at 250W vs 105W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 5900X better than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 291 FPS | 177 FPS |
| high | 243 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 307 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 192 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 157 FPS | 85 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 193 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 41 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 772 FPS | 536 FPS |
| medium | 647 FPS | 483 FPS |
| high | 508 FPS | 404 FPS |
| ultra | 450 FPS | 354 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 619 FPS | 473 FPS |
| medium | 536 FPS | 424 FPS |
| high | 443 FPS | 360 FPS |
| ultra | 364 FPS | 299 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 295 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 242 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 213 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 832 FPS | 768 FPS |
| medium | 645 FPS | 640 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 577 FPS |
| ultra | 459 FPS | 504 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 721 FPS | 640 FPS |
| medium | 565 FPS | 533 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 465 FPS |
| ultra | 407 FPS | 408 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 511 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 421 FPS | 377 FPS |
| high | 374 FPS | 336 FPS |
| ultra | 308 FPS | 280 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 974 FPS | 774 FPS |
| medium | 974 FPS | 774 FPS |
| high | 934 FPS | 704 FPS |
| ultra | 826 FPS | 616 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 959 FPS | 730 FPS |
| medium | 843 FPS | 644 FPS |
| high | 726 FPS | 549 FPS |
| ultra | 617 FPS | 474 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 694 FPS | 523 FPS |
| medium | 621 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 541 FPS | 419 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 362 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 5900X and Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX


Ryzen 9 5900X
Ryzen 9 5900X
The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.


Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
The Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 30,954 points. Launch price was $1,299.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 5900X packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX — a 13.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Ryzen 9 5900X uses the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX uses Zen+ (2018−2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 5900X scores 38,955 against the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX's 30,954 — a 22.9% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 21,000 vs 29,045 (32.2% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,174 vs 1,240, a 54.7% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,888 vs 7,241 (48.6% advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X). Both processors carry 64 MB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24 | 24 / 48+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+14% | 4.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+23% | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB | 64 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-42% | 12 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) | Zen+ (2018−2019) |
| PassMark | 38,955+26% | 30,954 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 21,000 | 29,045+38% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,174+75% | 1,240 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,888+64% | 7,241 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 5900X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 5900X) vs 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 9 5900X) vs 64 (Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 9 5900X) and X399 (Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX).
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | TR4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 2048 GB+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 64+167% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AMD-V virtualization. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation, Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX targets Extreme Multi-threaded Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K; Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX rivals Core i9-7940X.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Workstation | Extreme Multi-threaded Workstation |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 9 5900X launched at $549 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX debuted at $1299. On MSRP ($549 vs $1299), the Ryzen 9 5900X is $750 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 9 5900X delivers 71.0 pts/$ vs 23.8 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX — making the Ryzen 9 5900X the 99.4% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $549-58% | $1299 |
| Performance per Dollar | 71.0+198% | 23.8 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2018 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












