
Ryzen 9 5900X
Popular choices:

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.1% higher average FPS across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $3,441 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $3,990 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 254.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 71.0 vs 20.0 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $3,990 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 280W, a 175W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (21,000 vs 64,366).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (64 MB vs 256 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 3990X, which brings 64 cores / 128 threads and 88 PCIe lanes.
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
2019Why buy it
- ✅+206.5% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 64 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 64 cores / 128 threads, plus 88 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅266.7% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 20.0 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($3,990 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ❌166.7% higher power demand at 280W vs 105W.
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.1% higher average FPS across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $3,441 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $3,990 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 254.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 71.0 vs 20.0 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $3,990 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 280W, a 175W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+206.5% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 64 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 64 cores / 128 threads, plus 88 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅266.7% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (21,000 vs 64,366).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (64 MB vs 256 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 3990X, which brings 64 cores / 128 threads and 88 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 20.0 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($3,990 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ❌166.7% higher power demand at 280W vs 105W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 5900X better than Ryzen Threadripper 3990X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Threadripper 3990X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 291 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 243 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 307 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 192 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 157 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 193 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 46 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Threadripper 3990X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 772 FPS | 584 FPS |
| medium | 647 FPS | 503 FPS |
| high | 508 FPS | 386 FPS |
| ultra | 450 FPS | 330 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 619 FPS | 491 FPS |
| medium | 536 FPS | 433 FPS |
| high | 443 FPS | 343 FPS |
| ultra | 364 FPS | 277 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 308 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 275 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 235 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 204 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Threadripper 3990X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 832 FPS | 681 FPS |
| medium | 645 FPS | 563 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 497 FPS |
| ultra | 459 FPS | 428 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 721 FPS | 582 FPS |
| medium | 565 FPS | 488 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 427 FPS |
| ultra | 407 FPS | 368 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 511 FPS | 424 FPS |
| medium | 421 FPS | 338 FPS |
| high | 374 FPS | 293 FPS |
| ultra | 308 FPS | 234 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Threadripper 3990X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 974 FPS | 942 FPS |
| medium | 974 FPS | 842 FPS |
| high | 934 FPS | 724 FPS |
| ultra | 826 FPS | 639 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 959 FPS | 777 FPS |
| medium | 843 FPS | 677 FPS |
| high | 726 FPS | 580 FPS |
| ultra | 617 FPS | 502 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 694 FPS | 540 FPS |
| medium | 621 FPS | 489 FPS |
| high | 541 FPS | 429 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 373 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 5900X and Ryzen Threadripper 3990X


Ryzen 9 5900X
Ryzen 9 5900X
The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.


Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
The Ryzen Threadripper 3990X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 79,889 points. Launch price was $3,999.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 5900X packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X offers 64 cores / 128 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X has 52 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X — a 11% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X (base: 3.7 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Ryzen 9 5900X uses the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 5900X scores 38,955 against the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X's 79,889 — a 68.9% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 21,000 vs 64,366 (101.6% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,174 vs 1,961, a 10.3% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,888 vs 22,045 (59.9% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X). L3 cache: 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900X vs 256 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Threadripper 3990X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24 | 64 / 128+433% |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+12% | 4.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+28% | 2.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB | 256 MB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) | Matisse (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 38,955 | 79,889+105% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 21,000 | 64,366+207% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,174+11% | 1,961 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,888 | 22,045+85% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 5900X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Ryzen Threadripper 3990X supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 5900X) vs 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 3990X). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 9 5900X) vs 88 (Ryzen Threadripper 3990X) — the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 9 5900X) and TRX40 (Ryzen Threadripper 3990X).
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Threadripper 3990X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | TR4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 256 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 88+267% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900X) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper 3990X). Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K; Ryzen Threadripper 3990X rivals Core i9-10980XE.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Threadripper 3990X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | true |
| Target Use | Workstation | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 9 5900X launched at $549 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X debuted at $3990. On MSRP ($549 vs $3990), the Ryzen 9 5900X is $3441 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 9 5900X delivers 71.0 pts/$ vs 20.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X — making the Ryzen 9 5900X the 112% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Threadripper 3990X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $549-86% | $3990 |
| Performance per Dollar | 71.0+255% | 20.0 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












