Ryzen 9 5900X
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
Ryzen 9 5900X vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 9 5900X vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 9 5900X vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $788 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $1,337 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 52.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 71.0 vs 46.6 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $1,337 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 280W, a 175W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (21,000 vs 42,986).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (64 MB vs 128 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
2020Why buy it
- ✅+104.7% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 64 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 46.6 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($1,337 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ❌166.7% higher power demand at 280W vs 105W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 5900X better than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 9 5900X vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Ryzen 9 5900X
The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2020-07-14. It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,261 points. Launch price was $4,499.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 5900X packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX has 20 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX — a 13.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Ryzen 9 5900X uses the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 5900X scores 38,955 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX's 62,261 — a 46.1% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 21,000 vs 42,986 (68.7% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,174 vs 1,260, a 53.2% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,888 vs 25,211 (71.8% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX). L3 cache: 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900X vs 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24 | 32 / 64+167% |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+14% | 4.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+6% | 3.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB | 128 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) | Matisse (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 38,955 | 62,261+60% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 21,000 | 42,986+105% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,174+73% | 1,260 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,888 | 25,211+112% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 5900X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 5900X) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 9 5900X) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 9 5900X) and AMD WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX).
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | sWRX8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 2048 GB+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 128+433% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900X) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX). Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX rivals Xeon W-3375.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | true |
| Target Use | Workstation | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen 9 5900X was priced at $549, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX came in at $1337. On launch pricing ($549 vs $1337), Ryzen 9 5900X was $788 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 9 5900X delivers 71.0 pts/$ vs 46.6 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX — making the Ryzen 9 5900X the 41.5% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $549-59% | $1337 |
| Performance per Dollar | 71.0+52% | 46.6 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2020 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen 9 5900X and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
