
Ryzen 9 5900X
Popular choices:

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $250 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 16.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 71.0 vs 61.0 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 280W, a 175W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (38,955 vs 48,756).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 61.0 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($799 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ❌166.7% higher power demand at 280W vs 105W.
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $250 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 16.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 71.0 vs 61.0 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 280W, a 175W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (38,955 vs 48,756).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 61.0 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($799 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ❌166.7% higher power demand at 280W vs 105W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX better than Ryzen 9 5900X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 291 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 243 FPS | 148 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 108 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 307 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 192 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 157 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 193 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 50 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 772 FPS | 770 FPS |
| medium | 647 FPS | 656 FPS |
| high | 508 FPS | 516 FPS |
| ultra | 450 FPS | 453 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 619 FPS | 639 FPS |
| medium | 536 FPS | 554 FPS |
| high | 443 FPS | 457 FPS |
| ultra | 364 FPS | 373 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 375 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 327 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 296 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 262 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 832 FPS | 806 FPS |
| medium | 645 FPS | 662 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 605 FPS |
| ultra | 459 FPS | 526 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 721 FPS | 618 FPS |
| medium | 565 FPS | 507 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 459 FPS |
| ultra | 407 FPS | 395 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 511 FPS | 448 FPS |
| medium | 421 FPS | 357 FPS |
| high | 374 FPS | 323 FPS |
| ultra | 308 FPS | 258 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 974 FPS | 1200 FPS |
| medium | 974 FPS | 1015 FPS |
| high | 934 FPS | 911 FPS |
| ultra | 826 FPS | 806 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 959 FPS | 933 FPS |
| medium | 843 FPS | 817 FPS |
| high | 726 FPS | 703 FPS |
| ultra | 617 FPS | 601 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 694 FPS | 667 FPS |
| medium | 621 FPS | 599 FPS |
| high | 541 FPS | 521 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 5900X and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX


Ryzen 9 5900X
Ryzen 9 5900X
The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 8 March 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 48,756 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 5900X packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX — a 6.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X (base: 3.7 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Ryzen 9 5900X uses the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX uses Chagall PRO (2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 5900X scores 38,955 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX's 48,756 — a 22.3% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX. Both processors carry 64 MB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24 | 16 / 32+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+7% | 4.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz | 4 GHz+8% |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB | 64 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) | Chagall PRO (2022) |
| PassMark | 38,955 | 48,756+25% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 21,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,174 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,888 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 5900X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 5900X versus 3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX supports 199.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX supports up to 2048 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 5900X) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 9 5900X) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 9 5900X) and WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX).
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | sWRX8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | 3200+79900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+6553500% | 2048 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 128+433% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900X) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX). Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX rivals Xeon w5-3335.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
| Target Use | Workstation | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 9 5900X launched at $549 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX debuted at $799. On MSRP ($549 vs $799), the Ryzen 9 5900X is $250 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 9 5900X delivers 71.0 pts/$ vs 61.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX — making the Ryzen 9 5900X the 15.1% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $549-31% | $799 |
| Performance per Dollar | 71.0+16% | 61.0 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












