PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 9 5900X

2020

Why buy it

✅+28.9% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Costs $1,946 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $2,495 MSRP).
✅Delivers 136.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 71.0 vs 30.1 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $2,495 MSRP).
✅Draws 105W instead of 280W, a 175W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (21,000 vs 53,977).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (64 MB vs 128 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

2022

Why buy it

✅+157% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 64 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,686 vs 2,174).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 30.1 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($2,495 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
❌166.7% higher power demand at 280W vs 105W.

Ryzen 9 5900X

2020

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

2022

Why buy it

✅+28.9% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Costs $1,946 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $2,495 MSRP).
✅Delivers 136.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 71.0 vs 30.1 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $2,495 MSRP).
✅Draws 105W instead of 280W, a 175W reduction.

Why buy it

✅+157% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 64 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (21,000 vs 53,977).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (64 MB vs 128 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,686 vs 2,174).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 30.1 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($2,495 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
❌166.7% higher power demand at 280W vs 105W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 9 5900X better than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 9 5900X is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX is the better fit. You are getting 157% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 64 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 9 5900X is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 9 5900X is $1,946 cheaper on MSRP at $549 MSRP versus $2,495 MSRP, and it gives you a 1.1% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 157% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. It is also 136.1% better value on MSRP (71.0 vs 30.1 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2020), 100% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 64 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 32 cores / 64 threads instead of 12/24. That extra cache should hold up really well in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 9 5900X Benchmark Check

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 9 5900X	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
1080p
low	323 FPS	223 FPS
medium	291 FPS	184 FPS
high	243 FPS	156 FPS
ultra	193 FPS	114 FPS
1440p
low	307 FPS	194 FPS
medium	248 FPS	156 FPS
high	192 FPS	126 FPS
ultra	157 FPS	94 FPS
4K
low	193 FPS	94 FPS
medium	156 FPS	81 FPS
high	115 FPS	63 FPS
ultra	103 FPS	51 FPS

Open Ryzen 9 5900X Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 9 5900X	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
1080p
low	772 FPS	777 FPS
medium	647 FPS	660 FPS
high	508 FPS	516 FPS
ultra	450 FPS	447 FPS
1440p
low	619 FPS	631 FPS
medium	536 FPS	548 FPS
high	443 FPS	448 FPS
ultra	364 FPS	364 FPS
4K
low	365 FPS	369 FPS
medium	318 FPS	322 FPS
high	289 FPS	289 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	255 FPS

Open Ryzen 9 5900X Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 9 5900X	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
1080p
low	832 FPS	783 FPS
medium	645 FPS	661 FPS
high	558 FPS	604 FPS
ultra	459 FPS	528 FPS
1440p
low	721 FPS	597 FPS
medium	565 FPS	503 FPS
high	488 FPS	455 FPS
ultra	407 FPS	394 FPS
4K
low	511 FPS	436 FPS
medium	421 FPS	351 FPS
high	374 FPS	317 FPS
ultra	308 FPS	253 FPS

Open Ryzen 9 5900X Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 9 5900X	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
1080p
low	974 FPS	1212 FPS
medium	974 FPS	1015 FPS
high	934 FPS	924 FPS
ultra	826 FPS	818 FPS
1440p
low	959 FPS	949 FPS
medium	843 FPS	826 FPS
high	726 FPS	713 FPS
ultra	617 FPS	609 FPS
4K
low	694 FPS	673 FPS
medium	621 FPS	604 FPS
high	541 FPS	527 FPS
ultra	437 FPS	437 FPS

Open Ryzen 9 5900X Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 5900X and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen 9 5900X

The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-08. It is based on the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 74,985 points. Launch price was $3,299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 9 5900X packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX has 20 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX — a 6.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Ryzen 9 5900X uses the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX uses Chagall PRO (2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 5900X scores 38,955 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX's 74,985 — a 63.2% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 21,000 vs 53,977 (88% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,174 vs 1,686, a 25.3% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,888 vs 29,745 (85.8% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX). L3 cache: 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900X vs 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX.

Feature	Ryzen 9 5900X	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
Cores / Threads	12 / 24	32 / 64+167%
Boost Clock	4.8 GHz+7%	4.5 GHz
Base Clock	3.7 GHz+3%	3.6 GHz
L3 Cache	64 MB	128 MB+100%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	512K (per core)
Process	7 nm, 12 nm	7 nm
Architecture	Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022)	Chagall PRO (2022)
PassMark	38,955	74,985+92%
Cinebench R23 Multi	21,000	53,977+157%
Geekbench 6 Single	2,174+29%	1,686
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,888	29,745+150%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 9 5900X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 5900X) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 9 5900X) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 9 5900X) and WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX).

Feature	Ryzen 9 5900X	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
Socket	AM4	sWRX8
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	2048 GB+1500%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	24	128+433%

🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900X) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX). Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX rivals Xeon Gold 6338.

Feature	Ryzen 9 5900X	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	Yes	Yes
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	AMD-V	true
Target Use	Workstation	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 9 5900X launched at $549 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX debuted at $2495. On MSRP ($549 vs $2495), the Ryzen 9 5900X is $1946 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 9 5900X delivers 71.0 pts/$ vs 30.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX — making the Ryzen 9 5900X the 81% better value option.