
Ryzen 9 5900X
Popular choices:

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $791 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $1,340 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 67.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 71.0 vs 42.4 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $1,340 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 350W, a 245W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (38,955 vs 56,854).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX moves to sTR5 and DDR5.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on sTR5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 42.4 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($1,340 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ❌233.3% higher power demand at 350W vs 105W.
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $791 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $1,340 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 67.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 71.0 vs 42.4 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $1,340 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 350W, a 245W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on sTR5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (38,955 vs 56,854).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX moves to sTR5 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 42.4 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($1,340 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ❌233.3% higher power demand at 350W vs 105W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX better than Ryzen 9 5900X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 278 FPS |
| medium | 291 FPS | 253 FPS |
| high | 243 FPS | 216 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 188 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 307 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 192 FPS | 169 FPS |
| ultra | 157 FPS | 152 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 193 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 98 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 772 FPS | 786 FPS |
| medium | 647 FPS | 649 FPS |
| high | 508 FPS | 483 FPS |
| ultra | 450 FPS | 408 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 619 FPS | 645 FPS |
| medium | 536 FPS | 552 FPS |
| high | 443 FPS | 426 FPS |
| ultra | 364 FPS | 331 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 362 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 314 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 275 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 232 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 832 FPS | 886 FPS |
| medium | 645 FPS | 704 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 622 FPS |
| ultra | 459 FPS | 534 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 721 FPS | 712 FPS |
| medium | 565 FPS | 566 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 488 FPS |
| ultra | 407 FPS | 414 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 511 FPS | 507 FPS |
| medium | 421 FPS | 418 FPS |
| high | 374 FPS | 375 FPS |
| ultra | 308 FPS | 315 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 974 FPS | 1106 FPS |
| medium | 974 FPS | 991 FPS |
| high | 934 FPS | 867 FPS |
| ultra | 826 FPS | 781 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 959 FPS | 860 FPS |
| medium | 843 FPS | 759 FPS |
| high | 726 FPS | 664 FPS |
| ultra | 617 FPS | 576 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 694 FPS | 632 FPS |
| medium | 621 FPS | 562 FPS |
| high | 541 FPS | 496 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 429 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 5900X and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX


Ryzen 9 5900X
Ryzen 9 5900X
The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2025-01-01. It is based on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 4.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 56,854 points. Launch price was $2,000.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 9 5900X and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX share an identical 12-core/24-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX — a 11.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX (base: 3.7 GHz vs 4.7 GHz). The Ryzen 9 5900X uses the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX uses Shimada Peak (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 5900X scores 38,955 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX's 56,854 — a 37.4% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX. L3 cache: 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900X vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24 | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz | 5.4 GHz+13% |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz | 4.7 GHz+27% |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB | 64 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) | Shimada Peak (2025) |
| PassMark | 38,955 | 56,854+46% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 21,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,174 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,888 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 5900X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 5900X versus 6400 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX supports 199.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX supports up to 2048 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 5900X) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 9 5900X) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 9 5900X) and WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX).
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | sTR5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | 6400+159900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+6553500% | 2048 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 128+433% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900X) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX). Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX rivals Xeon w7-3545.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
| Target Use | Workstation | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 9 5900X launched at $549 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX debuted at $1340. On MSRP ($549 vs $1340), the Ryzen 9 5900X is $791 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 9 5900X delivers 71.0 pts/$ vs 42.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX — making the Ryzen 9 5900X the 50.3% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $549-59% | $1340 |
| Performance per Dollar | 71.0+67% | 42.4 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












