
Ryzen 9 5900X
Popular choices:

Xeon 6349P
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +20.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+255.6% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $549 MSRP, while Xeon 6349P mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon 6349P moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Xeon 6349P
2025Why buy it
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (25,953 vs 38,955).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 64 MB).
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Xeon 6349P
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +20.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+255.6% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $549 MSRP, while Xeon 6349P mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon 6349P moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (25,953 vs 38,955).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 64 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 5900X better than Xeon 6349P?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon 6349P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 278 FPS |
| medium | 291 FPS | 260 FPS |
| high | 243 FPS | 218 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 307 FPS | 242 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 202 FPS |
| high | 192 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 157 FPS | 143 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 193 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 96 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon 6349P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 772 FPS | 615 FPS |
| medium | 647 FPS | 510 FPS |
| high | 508 FPS | 425 FPS |
| ultra | 450 FPS | 374 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 619 FPS | 528 FPS |
| medium | 536 FPS | 451 FPS |
| high | 443 FPS | 380 FPS |
| ultra | 364 FPS | 322 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 331 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 292 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 227 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon 6349P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 832 FPS | 649 FPS |
| medium | 645 FPS | 649 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 649 FPS |
| ultra | 459 FPS | 583 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 721 FPS | 649 FPS |
| medium | 565 FPS | 649 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 560 FPS |
| ultra | 407 FPS | 484 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 511 FPS | 517 FPS |
| medium | 421 FPS | 462 FPS |
| high | 374 FPS | 403 FPS |
| ultra | 308 FPS | 337 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon 6349P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 974 FPS | 649 FPS |
| medium | 974 FPS | 649 FPS |
| high | 934 FPS | 649 FPS |
| ultra | 826 FPS | 649 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 959 FPS | 649 FPS |
| medium | 843 FPS | 649 FPS |
| high | 726 FPS | 639 FPS |
| ultra | 617 FPS | 548 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 694 FPS | 557 FPS |
| medium | 621 FPS | 495 FPS |
| high | 541 FPS | 435 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 369 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 5900X and Xeon 6349P


Ryzen 9 5900X
Ryzen 9 5900X
The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.

Xeon 6349P
Xeon 6349P
The Xeon 6349P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 25,953 points. Launch price was $509.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 5900X packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon 6349P offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Ryzen 9 5900X has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X versus 5.4 GHz on the Xeon 6349P — a 11.8% clock advantage for the Xeon 6349P (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Ryzen 9 5900X uses the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon 6349P uses Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 5900X scores 38,955 against the Xeon 6349P's 25,953 — a 40.1% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X. L3 cache: 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900X vs 18 MB (total) on the Xeon 6349P.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon 6349P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24+100% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz | 5.4 GHz+13% |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+3% | 3.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB+256% | 18 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 38,955+50% | 25,953 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 21,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,174 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,888 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 5900X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6349P uses LGA1700 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon 6349P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900X) / not specified (Xeon 6349P). Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon 6349P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Workstation | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












