
Ryzen 9 5900X
Popular choices:

Xeon 6724P
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,073 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $3,622 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 575.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 71.0 vs 10.5 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $3,622 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 210W, a 105W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6724P across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (11,888 vs 25,000).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon 6724P, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 88 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon 6724P moves to LGA4710 and DDR5.
Xeon 6724P
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 88 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4710 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅266.7% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.5 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($3,622 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 210W vs 105W.
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Xeon 6724P
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,073 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $3,622 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 575.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 71.0 vs 10.5 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $3,622 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 210W, a 105W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 88 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4710 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅266.7% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6724P across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (11,888 vs 25,000).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon 6724P, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 88 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon 6724P moves to LGA4710 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.5 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($3,622 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 210W vs 105W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon 6724P better than Ryzen 9 5900X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon 6724P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 291 FPS | 155 FPS |
| high | 243 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 307 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 192 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 157 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 193 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 45 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon 6724P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 772 FPS | 567 FPS |
| medium | 647 FPS | 490 FPS |
| high | 508 FPS | 397 FPS |
| ultra | 450 FPS | 353 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 619 FPS | 487 FPS |
| medium | 536 FPS | 428 FPS |
| high | 443 FPS | 359 FPS |
| ultra | 364 FPS | 299 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 305 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 271 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 245 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 220 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon 6724P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 832 FPS | 952 FPS |
| medium | 645 FPS | 952 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 921 FPS |
| ultra | 459 FPS | 834 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 721 FPS | 866 FPS |
| medium | 565 FPS | 761 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 703 FPS |
| ultra | 407 FPS | 632 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 511 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 421 FPS | 445 FPS |
| high | 374 FPS | 392 FPS |
| ultra | 308 FPS | 322 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon 6724P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 974 FPS | 952 FPS |
| medium | 974 FPS | 952 FPS |
| high | 934 FPS | 952 FPS |
| ultra | 826 FPS | 821 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 959 FPS | 952 FPS |
| medium | 843 FPS | 868 FPS |
| high | 726 FPS | 732 FPS |
| ultra | 617 FPS | 626 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 694 FPS | 717 FPS |
| medium | 621 FPS | 631 FPS |
| high | 541 FPS | 543 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 5900X and Xeon 6724P


Ryzen 9 5900X
Ryzen 9 5900X
The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.

Xeon 6724P
Xeon 6724P
The Xeon 6724P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 72 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 210 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 38,061 points. Launch price was $3,622.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 5900X packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon 6724P offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon 6724P has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X versus 4.3 GHz on the Xeon 6724P — a 11% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Ryzen 9 5900X uses the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon 6724P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 5900X scores 38,955 against the Xeon 6724P's 38,061 — a 2.3% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,174 vs 1,800, a 18.8% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,888 vs 25,000 (71.1% advantage for the Xeon 6724P). L3 cache: 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900X vs 72 MB (total) on the Xeon 6724P.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon 6724P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24 | 16 / 32+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+12% | 4.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+3% | 3.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB | 72 MB (total)+13% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | Intel 3 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) | Granite Rapids (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 38,955+2% | 38,061 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 21,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,174+21% | 1,800 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,888 | 25,000+110% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 5900X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6724P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 5900X versus DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6724P — the Xeon 6724P supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon 6724P supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 5900X) vs 8 (Xeon 6724P). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 9 5900X) vs 88 (Xeon 6724P) — the Xeon 6724P offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 9 5900X) and C741 (Xeon 6724P).
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon 6724P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA4710 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-6400+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 4096 GB+3100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 88+267% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 5900X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon 6724P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900X) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon 6724P). Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation, Xeon 6724P targets Server. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K; Xeon 6724P rivals EPYC 9554.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon 6724P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Workstation | Server |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 9 5900X launched at $549 MSRP, while the Xeon 6724P debuted at $3622. On MSRP ($549 vs $3622), the Ryzen 9 5900X is $3073 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 9 5900X delivers 71.0 pts/$ vs 10.5 pts/$ for the Xeon 6724P — making the Ryzen 9 5900X the 148.4% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon 6724P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $549-85% | $3622 |
| Performance per Dollar | 71.0+576% | 10.5 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












