Ryzen 9 5900X
Xeon 6737P
Ryzen 9 5900X vs Xeon 6737P Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 9 5900X vs Xeon 6737P FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 9 5900X vs Xeon 6737P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +27.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $4,446 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $4,995 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 345.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 71.0 vs 15.9 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $4,995 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 270W, a 165W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (11,888 vs 45,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (64 MB vs 144 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon 6737P, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 88 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon 6737P moves to LGA4710 and DDR5.
Xeon 6737P
2025Why buy it
- ✅+278.5% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅+125% larger total L3 cache (144 MB vs 64 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 88 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4710 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅266.7% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.9 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($4,995 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ❌157.1% higher power demand at 270W vs 105W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 5900X better than Xeon 6737P?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 9 5900X vs Xeon 6737P Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Ryzen 9 5900X
The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.
Xeon 6737P
The Xeon 6737P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 144 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 79,634 points. Launch price was $4,995.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 5900X packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon 6737P offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon 6737P has 20 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X versus 4 GHz on the Xeon 6737P — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X (base: 3.7 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Ryzen 9 5900X uses the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon 6737P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 5900X scores 38,955 against the Xeon 6737P's 79,634 — a 68.6% lead for the Xeon 6737P. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,174 vs 2,000, a 8.3% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,888 vs 45,000 (116.4% advantage for the Xeon 6737P). L3 cache: 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900X vs 144 MB (total) on the Xeon 6737P.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon 6737P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24 | 32 / 64+167% |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+20% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+28% | 2.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB | 144 MB (total)+125% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+25500% | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | Intel 3 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) | Granite Rapids (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 38,955 | 79,634+104% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 21,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,174+9% | 2,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,888 | 45,000+279% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 5900X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6737P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 5900X versus DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6737P — the Xeon 6737P supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon 6737P supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 3100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 5900X) vs 8 (Xeon 6737P). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 9 5900X) vs 88 (Xeon 6737P) — the Xeon 6737P offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 9 5900X) and C741 (Xeon 6737P).
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon 6737P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA4710 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-6400+100% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 4096 GB+3100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 88+267% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 5900X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon 6737P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900X) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon 6737P). Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation, Xeon 6737P targets High Performance Server. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K; Xeon 6737P rivals EPYC 9005.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon 6737P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Workstation | High Performance Server |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen 9 5900X was priced at $549, while the Xeon 6737P came in at $4995. On launch pricing ($549 vs $4995), Ryzen 9 5900X was $4446 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 9 5900X delivers 71.0 pts/$ vs 15.9 pts/$ for the Xeon 6737P — making the Ryzen 9 5900X the 126.6% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon 6737P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $549-89% | $4995 |
| Performance per Dollar | 71.0+347% | 15.9 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2025 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen 9 5900X and Xeon 6737P
