
Ryzen 9 5900X
Popular choices:

Xeon 6741P
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $3,872 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $4,421 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 211.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 71.0 vs 22.8 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $4,421 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 300W, a 195W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (38,955 vs 100,660).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (64 MB vs 288 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon 6741P, which brings 48 cores / 96 threads and 136 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon 6741P moves to LGA4710 and DDR5.
Xeon 6741P
2025Why buy it
- ✅+158.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅+350% larger total L3 cache (288 MB vs 64 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 48 cores / 96 threads, plus 136 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4710 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅466.7% more PCIe lanes (136 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 22.8 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($4,421 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ❌185.7% higher power demand at 300W vs 105W.
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Xeon 6741P
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $3,872 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $4,421 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 211.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 71.0 vs 22.8 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $4,421 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 300W, a 195W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+158.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅+350% larger total L3 cache (288 MB vs 64 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 48 cores / 96 threads, plus 136 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4710 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅466.7% more PCIe lanes (136 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (38,955 vs 100,660).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (64 MB vs 288 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon 6741P, which brings 48 cores / 96 threads and 136 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon 6741P moves to LGA4710 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 22.8 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($4,421 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ❌185.7% higher power demand at 300W vs 105W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 5900X better than Xeon 6741P?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon 6741P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 291 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 243 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 307 FPS | 155 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 192 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 157 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 193 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 40 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon 6741P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 772 FPS | 520 FPS |
| medium | 647 FPS | 460 FPS |
| high | 508 FPS | 376 FPS |
| ultra | 450 FPS | 309 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 619 FPS | 425 FPS |
| medium | 536 FPS | 383 FPS |
| high | 443 FPS | 321 FPS |
| ultra | 364 FPS | 256 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 212 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 176 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon 6741P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 832 FPS | 849 FPS |
| medium | 645 FPS | 768 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 730 FPS |
| ultra | 459 FPS | 641 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 721 FPS | 737 FPS |
| medium | 565 FPS | 662 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 626 FPS |
| ultra | 407 FPS | 558 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 511 FPS | 493 FPS |
| medium | 421 FPS | 402 FPS |
| high | 374 FPS | 364 FPS |
| ultra | 308 FPS | 303 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon 6741P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 974 FPS | 978 FPS |
| medium | 974 FPS | 883 FPS |
| high | 934 FPS | 763 FPS |
| ultra | 826 FPS | 659 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 959 FPS | 800 FPS |
| medium | 843 FPS | 698 FPS |
| high | 726 FPS | 601 FPS |
| ultra | 617 FPS | 514 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 694 FPS | 574 FPS |
| medium | 621 FPS | 516 FPS |
| high | 541 FPS | 458 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 395 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 5900X and Xeon 6741P


Ryzen 9 5900X
Ryzen 9 5900X
The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.

Xeon 6741P
Xeon 6741P
The Xeon 6741P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 288 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 300 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 100,660 points. Launch price was $4,421.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 5900X packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon 6741P offers 48 cores / 96 threads — the Xeon 6741P has 36 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon 6741P — a 23.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X (base: 3.7 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Ryzen 9 5900X uses the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon 6741P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 5900X scores 38,955 against the Xeon 6741P's 100,660 — a 88.4% lead for the Xeon 6741P. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,174 vs 3,195, a 38% lead for the Xeon 6741P that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900X vs 288 MB (total) on the Xeon 6741P.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon 6741P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24 | 48 / 96+300% |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+26% | 3.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+48% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB | 288 MB (total)+350% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | Intel 3 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) | Granite Rapids (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 38,955 | 100,660+158% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 21,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,174 | 3,195+47% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,888 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 5900X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6741P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 5900X versus DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6741P — the Xeon 6741P supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 9 5900X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 4 TB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 5900X) vs 8 (Xeon 6741P). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 9 5900X) vs 136 (Xeon 6741P) — the Xeon 6741P offers 112 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon 6741P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA4710 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-6400+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 4 TB+3100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 136+467% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900X) vs VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT (Xeon 6741P). Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation, Xeon 6741P targets Data Center. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K; Xeon 6741P rivals EPYC 9555.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon 6741P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT |
| Target Use | Workstation | Data Center |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 9 5900X launched at $549 MSRP, while the Xeon 6741P debuted at $4421. On MSRP ($549 vs $4421), the Ryzen 9 5900X is $3872 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 9 5900X delivers 71.0 pts/$ vs 22.8 pts/$ for the Xeon 6741P — making the Ryzen 9 5900X the 102.8% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon 6741P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $549-88% | $4421 |
| Performance per Dollar | 71.0+211% | 22.8 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












