
Ryzen 9 5900X
Popular choices:

Xeon D-2166NT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +66.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+287.9% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 17 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $549 MSRP, while Xeon D-2166NT mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌23.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 85W.
Xeon D-2166NT
2018Why buy it
- ✅Draws 85W instead of 105W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (15,105 vs 38,955).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (17 MB vs 64 MB).
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Xeon D-2166NT
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +66.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+287.9% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 17 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 85W instead of 105W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $549 MSRP, while Xeon D-2166NT mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌23.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 85W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (15,105 vs 38,955).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (17 MB vs 64 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 5900X better than Xeon D-2166NT?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon D-2166NT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 291 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 243 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 307 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 192 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 157 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 193 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon D-2166NT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 772 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 647 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 508 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 450 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 619 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 536 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 443 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 364 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 58 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon D-2166NT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 832 FPS | 378 FPS |
| medium | 645 FPS | 378 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 378 FPS |
| ultra | 459 FPS | 378 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 721 FPS | 378 FPS |
| medium | 565 FPS | 378 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 366 FPS |
| ultra | 407 FPS | 318 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 511 FPS | 378 FPS |
| medium | 421 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 374 FPS | 258 FPS |
| ultra | 308 FPS | 207 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon D-2166NT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 974 FPS | 378 FPS |
| medium | 974 FPS | 378 FPS |
| high | 934 FPS | 378 FPS |
| ultra | 826 FPS | 378 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 959 FPS | 378 FPS |
| medium | 843 FPS | 378 FPS |
| high | 726 FPS | 378 FPS |
| ultra | 617 FPS | 378 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 694 FPS | 378 FPS |
| medium | 621 FPS | 378 FPS |
| high | 541 FPS | 357 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 306 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 5900X and Xeon D-2166NT


Ryzen 9 5900X
Ryzen 9 5900X
The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.

Xeon D-2166NT
Xeon D-2166NT
The Xeon D-2166NT is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 February 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 16.5 MB. L2 cache: 12 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2518. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 15,105 points. Launch price was $1,005.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 9 5900X and Xeon D-2166NT share an identical 12-core/24-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X versus 3 GHz on the Xeon D-2166NT — a 46.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X (base: 3.7 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 9 5900X uses the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon D-2166NT uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 5900X scores 38,955 against the Xeon D-2166NT's 15,105 — a 88.2% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X. L3 cache: 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900X vs 16.5 MB on the Xeon D-2166NT.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon D-2166NT |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24 | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+60% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+85% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB+288% | 16.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 12 MB+2300% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 38,955+158% | 15,105 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 21,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,174 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,888 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 5900X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon D-2166NT uses FCBGA2518 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon D-2166NT |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FCBGA2518 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900X) / not specified (Xeon D-2166NT). Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon D-2166NT |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Workstation | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












