
Ryzen 9 5900X
Popular choices:

Xeon E-2456
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +27.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+255.6% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $549 MSRP, while Xeon E-2456 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌31.3% higher power demand at 105W vs 80W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon E-2456 moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Xeon E-2456
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 105W, a 25W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (20,705 vs 38,955).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 64 MB).
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Xeon E-2456
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +27.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+255.6% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 105W, a 25W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $549 MSRP, while Xeon E-2456 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌31.3% higher power demand at 105W vs 80W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon E-2456 moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (20,705 vs 38,955).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 64 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 5900X better than Xeon E-2456?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon E-2456 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 267 FPS |
| medium | 291 FPS | 253 FPS |
| high | 243 FPS | 214 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 183 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 307 FPS | 235 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 199 FPS |
| high | 192 FPS | 162 FPS |
| ultra | 157 FPS | 142 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 193 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 95 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon E-2456 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 772 FPS | 518 FPS |
| medium | 647 FPS | 483 FPS |
| high | 508 FPS | 408 FPS |
| ultra | 450 FPS | 364 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 619 FPS | 493 FPS |
| medium | 536 FPS | 428 FPS |
| high | 443 FPS | 364 FPS |
| ultra | 364 FPS | 313 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 312 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 279 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 259 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 222 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon E-2456 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 832 FPS | 518 FPS |
| medium | 645 FPS | 518 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 518 FPS |
| ultra | 459 FPS | 518 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 721 FPS | 518 FPS |
| medium | 565 FPS | 518 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 518 FPS |
| ultra | 407 FPS | 469 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 511 FPS | 502 FPS |
| medium | 421 FPS | 448 FPS |
| high | 374 FPS | 391 FPS |
| ultra | 308 FPS | 327 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon E-2456 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 974 FPS | 518 FPS |
| medium | 974 FPS | 518 FPS |
| high | 934 FPS | 518 FPS |
| ultra | 826 FPS | 518 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 959 FPS | 518 FPS |
| medium | 843 FPS | 518 FPS |
| high | 726 FPS | 518 FPS |
| ultra | 617 FPS | 518 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 694 FPS | 518 FPS |
| medium | 621 FPS | 492 FPS |
| high | 541 FPS | 432 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 364 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 5900X and Xeon E-2456


Ryzen 9 5900X
Ryzen 9 5900X
The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.

Xeon E-2456
Xeon E-2456
The Xeon E-2456 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 20,705 points. Launch price was $375.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 5900X packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon E-2456 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Ryzen 9 5900X has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X versus 5.1 GHz on the Xeon E-2456 — a 6.1% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2456 (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Ryzen 9 5900X uses the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon E-2456 uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 5900X scores 38,955 against the Xeon E-2456's 20,705 — a 61.2% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X. L3 cache: 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900X vs 18 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2456.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon E-2456 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24+100% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz | 5.1 GHz+6% |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+12% | 3.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB+256% | 18 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 38,955+88% | 20,705 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 21,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,174 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,888 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 5900X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E-2456 uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon E-2456 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900X) / not specified (Xeon E-2456). Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon E-2456 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Workstation | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












