
Ryzen 9 5900X
Popular choices:

Xeon E3-1245 v6
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +177.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+700% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $549 MSRP, while Xeon E3-1245 v6 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌43.8% higher power demand at 105W vs 73W.
Xeon E3-1245 v6
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 73W instead of 105W, a 32W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,711 vs 38,955).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 64 MB).
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Xeon E3-1245 v6
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +177.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+700% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 73W instead of 105W, a 32W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $549 MSRP, while Xeon E3-1245 v6 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌43.8% higher power demand at 105W vs 73W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,711 vs 38,955).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 64 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 5900X better than Xeon E3-1245 v6?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon E3-1245 v6 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 291 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 243 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 307 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 192 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 157 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 193 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon E3-1245 v6 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 772 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 647 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 508 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 450 FPS | 169 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 619 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 536 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 443 FPS | 176 FPS |
| ultra | 364 FPS | 151 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 111 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon E3-1245 v6 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 832 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 645 FPS | 218 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 218 FPS |
| ultra | 459 FPS | 218 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 721 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 565 FPS | 218 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 218 FPS |
| ultra | 407 FPS | 218 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 511 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 421 FPS | 218 FPS |
| high | 374 FPS | 218 FPS |
| ultra | 308 FPS | 218 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon E3-1245 v6 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 974 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 974 FPS | 218 FPS |
| high | 934 FPS | 218 FPS |
| ultra | 826 FPS | 218 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 959 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 843 FPS | 218 FPS |
| high | 726 FPS | 218 FPS |
| ultra | 617 FPS | 218 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 694 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 621 FPS | 218 FPS |
| high | 541 FPS | 218 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 218 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 5900X and Xeon E3-1245 v6


Ryzen 9 5900X
Ryzen 9 5900X
The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.

Xeon E3-1245 v6
Xeon E3-1245 v6
The Xeon E3-1245 v6 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 28 March 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400, DDR3L-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 8,711 points. Launch price was $284.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 5900X packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon E3-1245 v6 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Ryzen 9 5900X has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon E3-1245 v6 — a 15.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Ryzen 9 5900X uses the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon E3-1245 v6 uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 5900X scores 38,955 against the Xeon E3-1245 v6's 8,711 — a 126.9% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X. L3 cache: 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900X vs 8 MB on the Xeon E3-1245 v6.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon E3-1245 v6 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24+200% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+17% | 4.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB+700% | 8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB+100% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) |
| PassMark | 38,955+347% | 8,711 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 21,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,174 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,888 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 5900X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E3-1245 v6 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon E3-1245 v6 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900X) / not specified (Xeon E3-1245 v6). Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon E3-1245 v6 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Workstation | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












