
Ryzen 9 5900X
Popular choices:

Xeon E5-2695 v4
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +64.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+42.2% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 45 MB).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 120W, a 15W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2695 v4, which brings 18 cores / 36 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $549 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2695 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon E5-2695 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 18 cores / 36 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,835 vs 38,955).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (45 MB vs 64 MB).
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Xeon E5-2695 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +64.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+42.2% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 45 MB).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 120W, a 15W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 18 cores / 36 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2695 v4, which brings 18 cores / 36 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $549 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2695 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,835 vs 38,955).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (45 MB vs 64 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 5900X better than Xeon E5-2695 v4?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon E5-2695 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 178 FPS |
| medium | 291 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 243 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 97 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 307 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 192 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 157 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 193 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon E5-2695 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 772 FPS | 210 FPS |
| medium | 647 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 508 FPS | 162 FPS |
| ultra | 450 FPS | 131 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 619 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 536 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 443 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 364 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 73 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon E5-2695 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 832 FPS | 471 FPS |
| medium | 645 FPS | 471 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 471 FPS |
| ultra | 459 FPS | 471 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 721 FPS | 471 FPS |
| medium | 565 FPS | 471 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 471 FPS |
| ultra | 407 FPS | 471 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 511 FPS | 447 FPS |
| medium | 421 FPS | 363 FPS |
| high | 374 FPS | 328 FPS |
| ultra | 308 FPS | 274 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon E5-2695 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 974 FPS | 471 FPS |
| medium | 974 FPS | 471 FPS |
| high | 934 FPS | 471 FPS |
| ultra | 826 FPS | 471 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 959 FPS | 471 FPS |
| medium | 843 FPS | 471 FPS |
| high | 726 FPS | 471 FPS |
| ultra | 617 FPS | 457 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 694 FPS | 471 FPS |
| medium | 621 FPS | 467 FPS |
| high | 541 FPS | 412 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 356 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 5900X and Xeon E5-2695 v4


Ryzen 9 5900X
Ryzen 9 5900X
The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.

Xeon E5-2695 v4
Xeon E5-2695 v4
The Xeon E5-2695 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB. L2 cache: 4.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 18,835 points. Launch price was $2,424.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 5900X packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon E5-2695 v4 offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Xeon E5-2695 v4 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X versus 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2695 v4 — a 37% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X (base: 3.7 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Ryzen 9 5900X uses the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon E5-2695 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 5900X scores 38,955 against the Xeon E5-2695 v4's 18,835 — a 69.6% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X. L3 cache: 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900X vs 45 MB on the Xeon E5-2695 v4.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon E5-2695 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24 | 18 / 36+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+45% | 3.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+76% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB+42% | 45 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 4.5 MB+800% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| PassMark | 38,955+107% | 18,835 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 21,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,174 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,888 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 5900X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2695 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon E5-2695 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900X) / not specified (Xeon E5-2695 v4). Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon E5-2695 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Workstation | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












