PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 9 5900X

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +36.2% higher average FPS across 46 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+70.7% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 38 MB).
✅Draws 105W instead of 155W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E7-4890 v2, which brings 15 cores / 30 threads and 32 PCIe lanes.
❌Launch MSRP is still $549 MSRP, while Xeon E7-4890 v2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E7-4890 v2

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 15 cores / 30 threads, plus 32 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (32 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 46 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (6,500 vs 21,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (38 MB vs 64 MB).
❌47.6% higher power demand at 155W vs 105W.

Ryzen 9 5900X

2020

Xeon E7-4890 v2

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +36.2% higher average FPS across 46 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+70.7% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 38 MB).
✅Draws 105W instead of 155W, a 50W reduction.

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 15 cores / 30 threads, plus 32 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (32 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E7-4890 v2, which brings 15 cores / 30 threads and 32 PCIe lanes.
❌Launch MSRP is still $549 MSRP, while Xeon E7-4890 v2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 46 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (6,500 vs 21,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (38 MB vs 64 MB).
❌47.6% higher power demand at 155W vs 105W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 9 5900X better than Xeon E7-4890 v2?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon E7-4890 v2 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 9 5900X is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 9 5900X is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 36.2% more average FPS across 46 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 9 5900X is the better fit. You are getting 223.1% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 70.7% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 38 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 9 5900X is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 9 5900X is at an unclear MSRP at $549 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 36.2% average FPS lead across 46 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (71.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 9 5900X is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2014), 70.7% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 38 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 24 threads instead of 15/30. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 9 5900X Benchmark Check

Xeon E7-4890 v2 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 9 5900X	Xeon E7-4890 v2
1080p
low	323 FPS	186 FPS
medium	291 FPS	148 FPS
high	243 FPS	118 FPS
ultra	193 FPS	92 FPS
1440p
low	307 FPS	153 FPS
medium	248 FPS	119 FPS
high	192 FPS	92 FPS
ultra	157 FPS	73 FPS
4K
low	193 FPS	72 FPS
medium	156 FPS	59 FPS
high	115 FPS	46 FPS
ultra	103 FPS	38 FPS

Open Ryzen 9 5900X Open Xeon E7-4890 v2

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 9 5900X	Xeon E7-4890 v2
1080p
low	772 FPS	368 FPS
medium	647 FPS	324 FPS
high	508 FPS	270 FPS
ultra	450 FPS	216 FPS
1440p
low	619 FPS	318 FPS
medium	536 FPS	282 FPS
high	443 FPS	238 FPS
ultra	364 FPS	184 FPS
4K
low	365 FPS	199 FPS
medium	318 FPS	178 FPS
high	289 FPS	152 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	121 FPS

Open Ryzen 9 5900X Open Xeon E7-4890 v2

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 9 5900X	Xeon E7-4890 v2
1080p
low	832 FPS	774 FPS
medium	645 FPS	774 FPS
high	558 FPS	763 FPS
ultra	459 FPS	679 FPS
1440p
low	721 FPS	744 FPS
medium	565 FPS	638 FPS
high	488 FPS	605 FPS
ultra	407 FPS	537 FPS
4K
low	511 FPS	479 FPS
medium	421 FPS	376 FPS
high	374 FPS	335 FPS
ultra	308 FPS	274 FPS

Open Ryzen 9 5900X Open Xeon E7-4890 v2

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 9 5900X	Xeon E7-4890 v2
1080p
low	974 FPS	774 FPS
medium	974 FPS	774 FPS
high	934 FPS	765 FPS
ultra	826 FPS	648 FPS
1440p
low	959 FPS	774 FPS
medium	843 FPS	686 FPS
high	726 FPS	586 FPS
ultra	617 FPS	493 FPS
4K
low	694 FPS	581 FPS
medium	621 FPS	506 FPS
high	541 FPS	442 FPS
ultra	437 FPS	377 FPS

Open Ryzen 9 5900X Open Xeon E7-4890 v2

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 5900X and Xeon E7-4890 v2

Ryzen 9 5900X

The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.

Xeon E7-4890 v2

The Xeon E7-4890 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 15 cores and 30 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 37.5 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 30,946 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 9 5900X packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon E7-4890 v2 offers 15 cores / 30 threads — the Xeon E7-4890 v2 has 3 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon E7-4890 v2 — a 34.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X (base: 3.7 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Ryzen 9 5900X is built on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 5900X scores 38,955 against the Xeon E7-4890 v2's 30,946 — a 22.9% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 21,000 vs 6,500 (105.5% advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,174 vs 730, a 99.4% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,888 vs 5,500 (73.5% advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X). L3 cache: 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900X vs 37.5 MB on the Xeon E7-4890 v2.

Feature	Ryzen 9 5900X	Xeon E7-4890 v2
Cores / Threads	12 / 24	15 / 30+25%
Boost Clock	4.8 GHz+41%	3.4 GHz
Base Clock	3.7 GHz+32%	2.8 GHz
L3 Cache	64 MB+71%	37.5 MB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	—
Process	7 nm, 12 nm-68%	22 nm
Architecture	Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022)	—
PassMark	38,955+26%	30,946
Cinebench R23 Multi	21,000+223%	6,500
Geekbench 6 Single	2,174+198%	730
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,888+116%	5,500

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 9 5900X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E7-4890 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 5900X versus DDR3-1600 on the Xeon E7-4890 v2 — the Ryzen 9 5900X supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E7-4890 v2 supports up to 1536 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 169.2% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 5900X) vs 4 (Xeon E7-4890 v2). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 9 5900X) vs 32 (Xeon E7-4890 v2) — the Xeon E7-4890 v2 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 9 5900X) and C602 (Xeon E7-4890 v2).

Feature	Ryzen 9 5900X	Xeon E7-4890 v2
Socket	AM4	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200+33%	DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	1536 GB+1100%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	24	32+33%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 9 5900X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900X) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon E7-4890 v2). Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation, Xeon E7-4890 v2 targets Enterprise Server (Legacy). Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K; Xeon E7-4890 v2 rivals Xeon E5-2697 v2.