
Ryzen 9 5900X
Popular choices:

Xeon E7-8867 v3
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +20.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+42.2% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 45 MB).
- ✅Costs $4,123 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $4,672 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 798.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 71.0 vs 7.9 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $4,672 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 165W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E7-8867 v3, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 32 PCIe lanes.
Xeon E7-8867 v3
2015Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 32 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (32 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (10,000 vs 11,888).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (45 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.9 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($4,672 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ❌57.1% higher power demand at 165W vs 105W.
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Xeon E7-8867 v3
2015Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +20.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+42.2% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 45 MB).
- ✅Costs $4,123 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $4,672 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 798.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 71.0 vs 7.9 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $4,672 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 165W, a 60W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 32 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (32 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E7-8867 v3, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 32 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (10,000 vs 11,888).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (45 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.9 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($4,672 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ❌57.1% higher power demand at 165W vs 105W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 5900X better than Xeon E7-8867 v3?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon E7-8867 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 291 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 243 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 307 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 192 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 157 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 193 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 40 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon E7-8867 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 772 FPS | 370 FPS |
| medium | 647 FPS | 335 FPS |
| high | 508 FPS | 279 FPS |
| ultra | 450 FPS | 223 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 619 FPS | 317 FPS |
| medium | 536 FPS | 291 FPS |
| high | 443 FPS | 246 FPS |
| ultra | 364 FPS | 189 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 184 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 124 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon E7-8867 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 832 FPS | 885 FPS |
| medium | 645 FPS | 792 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 752 FPS |
| ultra | 459 FPS | 665 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 721 FPS | 721 FPS |
| medium | 565 FPS | 637 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 605 FPS |
| ultra | 407 FPS | 539 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 511 FPS | 470 FPS |
| medium | 421 FPS | 387 FPS |
| high | 374 FPS | 354 FPS |
| ultra | 308 FPS | 296 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon E7-8867 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 974 FPS | 923 FPS |
| medium | 974 FPS | 845 FPS |
| high | 934 FPS | 725 FPS |
| ultra | 826 FPS | 619 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 959 FPS | 759 FPS |
| medium | 843 FPS | 661 FPS |
| high | 726 FPS | 563 FPS |
| ultra | 617 FPS | 468 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 694 FPS | 543 FPS |
| medium | 621 FPS | 483 FPS |
| high | 541 FPS | 422 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 357 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 5900X and Xeon E7-8867 v3


Ryzen 9 5900X
Ryzen 9 5900X
The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.

Xeon E7-8867 v3
Xeon E7-8867 v3
The Xeon E7-8867 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EX (2015) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1333/1600/1866, DDR3-1066/1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 36,908 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 5900X packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon E7-8867 v3 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon E7-8867 v3 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X versus 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E7-8867 v3 — a 37% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X (base: 3.7 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Ryzen 9 5900X uses the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon E7-8867 v3 uses Haswell-EX (2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 5900X scores 38,955 against the Xeon E7-8867 v3's 36,908 — a 5.4% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,174 vs 850, a 87.6% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,888 vs 10,000 (17.3% advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X). L3 cache: 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900X vs 45 MB (total) on the Xeon E7-8867 v3.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon E7-8867 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24 | 16 / 32+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+45% | 3.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+48% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB+42% | 45 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-68% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) | Haswell-EX (2015) |
| PassMark | 38,955+6% | 36,908 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 21,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,174+156% | 850 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,888+19% | 10,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 5900X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E7-8867 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Xeon E7-8867 v3 supports up to 1536 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 169.2% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 5900X) vs 4 (Xeon E7-8867 v3). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 9 5900X) vs 32 (Xeon E7-8867 v3) — the Xeon E7-8867 v3 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 9 5900X) and C602J (Xeon E7-8867 v3).
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon E7-8867 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-1866 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 1536 GB+1100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 32+33% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 5900X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900X) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E7-8867 v3). Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation, Xeon E7-8867 v3 targets Server. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon E7-8867 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Workstation | Server |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 9 5900X launched at $549 MSRP, while the Xeon E7-8867 v3 debuted at $4672. On MSRP ($549 vs $4672), the Ryzen 9 5900X is $4123 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 9 5900X delivers 71.0 pts/$ vs 7.9 pts/$ for the Xeon E7-8867 v3 — making the Ryzen 9 5900X the 159.9% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon E7-8867 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $549-88% | $4672 |
| Performance per Dollar | 71.0+799% | 7.9 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2015 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












