
Ryzen 9 5900X
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 5117
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +86.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+232.5% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 19 MB).
- ✅Costs $737 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $1,286 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 440.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 71.0 vs 13.1 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $1,286 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 5117, which brings 14 cores / 28 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon Gold 5117
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 14 cores / 28 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (16,897 vs 38,955).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (19 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.1 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($1,286 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Xeon Gold 5117
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +86.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+232.5% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 19 MB).
- ✅Costs $737 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $1,286 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 440.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 71.0 vs 13.1 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $1,286 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 14 cores / 28 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 5117, which brings 14 cores / 28 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (16,897 vs 38,955).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (19 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.1 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($1,286 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 5900X better than Xeon Gold 5117?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon Gold 5117 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 175 FPS |
| medium | 291 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 243 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 307 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 192 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 157 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 193 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon Gold 5117 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 772 FPS | 189 FPS |
| medium | 647 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 508 FPS | 145 FPS |
| ultra | 450 FPS | 119 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 619 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 536 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 443 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 364 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 97 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 68 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon Gold 5117 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 832 FPS | 422 FPS |
| medium | 645 FPS | 422 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 422 FPS |
| ultra | 459 FPS | 406 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 721 FPS | 422 FPS |
| medium | 565 FPS | 422 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 386 FPS |
| ultra | 407 FPS | 335 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 511 FPS | 401 FPS |
| medium | 421 FPS | 310 FPS |
| high | 374 FPS | 264 FPS |
| ultra | 308 FPS | 213 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon Gold 5117 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 974 FPS | 422 FPS |
| medium | 974 FPS | 422 FPS |
| high | 934 FPS | 422 FPS |
| ultra | 826 FPS | 422 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 959 FPS | 422 FPS |
| medium | 843 FPS | 422 FPS |
| high | 726 FPS | 422 FPS |
| ultra | 617 FPS | 415 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 694 FPS | 422 FPS |
| medium | 621 FPS | 401 FPS |
| high | 541 FPS | 357 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 306 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 5900X and Xeon Gold 5117


Ryzen 9 5900X
Ryzen 9 5900X
The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.

Xeon Gold 5117
Xeon Gold 5117
The Xeon Gold 5117 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB. L2 cache: 14 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 16,897 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 5900X packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon Gold 5117 offers 14 cores / 28 threads — the Xeon Gold 5117 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X versus 2.8 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5117 — a 52.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X (base: 3.7 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 9 5900X uses the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon Gold 5117 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 5900X scores 38,955 against the Xeon Gold 5117's 16,897 — a 79% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X. L3 cache: 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900X vs 19.25 MB on the Xeon Gold 5117.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon Gold 5117 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24 | 14 / 28+17% |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+71% | 2.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+85% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB+232% | 19.25 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 14 MB+2700% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 38,955+131% | 16,897 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 21,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,174 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,888 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 5900X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 5117 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 5900X versus 2400 on the Xeon Gold 5117 — the Xeon Gold 5117 supports 199.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 5117 supports up to 768 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 142.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 5900X) vs 6 (Xeon Gold 5117). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 9 5900X) vs 48 (Xeon Gold 5117) — the Xeon Gold 5117 offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 9 5900X) and C621 (Xeon Gold 5117).
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon Gold 5117 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | 2400+59900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+17476167% | 768 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 6+200% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 48+100% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 5900X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon Gold 5117 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900X) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 5117). Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K; Xeon Gold 5117 rivals Xeon Silver 4114.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon Gold 5117 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Workstation | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 9 5900X launched at $549 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 5117 debuted at $1286. On MSRP ($549 vs $1286), the Ryzen 9 5900X is $737 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 9 5900X delivers 71.0 pts/$ vs 13.1 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 5117 — making the Ryzen 9 5900X the 137.5% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon Gold 5117 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $549-57% | $1286 |
| Performance per Dollar | 71.0+442% | 13.1 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2017 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












