
Ryzen 9 5900X
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6426Y
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Why buy it
- ✅+70.7% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 38 MB).
- ✅Costs $1,596 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $2,145 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 301.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 71.0 vs 17.7 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $2,145 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 185W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6426Y, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 80 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon Gold 6426Y moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon Gold 6426Y
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 80 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅233.3% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (37,944 vs 38,955).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (38 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 17.7 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($2,145 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ❌76.2% higher power demand at 185W vs 105W.
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Xeon Gold 6426Y
2023Why buy it
- ✅+70.7% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 38 MB).
- ✅Costs $1,596 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $2,145 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 301.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 71.0 vs 17.7 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $2,145 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 185W, a 80W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 80 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅233.3% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6426Y, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 80 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon Gold 6426Y moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (37,944 vs 38,955).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (38 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 17.7 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($2,145 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ❌76.2% higher power demand at 185W vs 105W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 5900X better than Xeon Gold 6426Y?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon Gold 6426Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 196 FPS |
| medium | 291 FPS | 160 FPS |
| high | 243 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 307 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 192 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 157 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 193 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 39 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon Gold 6426Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 772 FPS | 576 FPS |
| medium | 647 FPS | 503 FPS |
| high | 508 FPS | 406 FPS |
| ultra | 450 FPS | 361 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 619 FPS | 497 FPS |
| medium | 536 FPS | 439 FPS |
| high | 443 FPS | 365 FPS |
| ultra | 364 FPS | 304 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 311 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 278 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 251 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 225 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon Gold 6426Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 832 FPS | 949 FPS |
| medium | 645 FPS | 949 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 927 FPS |
| ultra | 459 FPS | 842 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 721 FPS | 875 FPS |
| medium | 565 FPS | 777 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 708 FPS |
| ultra | 407 FPS | 637 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 511 FPS | 548 FPS |
| medium | 421 FPS | 451 FPS |
| high | 374 FPS | 391 FPS |
| ultra | 308 FPS | 321 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon Gold 6426Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 974 FPS | 949 FPS |
| medium | 974 FPS | 886 FPS |
| high | 934 FPS | 766 FPS |
| ultra | 826 FPS | 657 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 959 FPS | 762 FPS |
| medium | 843 FPS | 668 FPS |
| high | 726 FPS | 574 FPS |
| ultra | 617 FPS | 493 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 694 FPS | 555 FPS |
| medium | 621 FPS | 494 FPS |
| high | 541 FPS | 435 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 371 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 5900X and Xeon Gold 6426Y


Ryzen 9 5900X
Ryzen 9 5900X
The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.

Xeon Gold 6426Y
Xeon Gold 6426Y
The Xeon Gold 6426Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 37.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 185 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 37,944 points. Launch price was $1,517.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 5900X packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6426Y offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon Gold 6426Y has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6426Y — a 15.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X (base: 3.7 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Ryzen 9 5900X uses the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6426Y uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 5900X scores 38,955 against the Xeon Gold 6426Y's 37,944 — a 2.6% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X. L3 cache: 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900X vs 37.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 6426Y.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon Gold 6426Y |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24 | 16 / 32+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+17% | 4.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+48% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB+71% | 37.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 38,955+3% | 37,944 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 21,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,174 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,888 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 5900X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6426Y uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 5900X versus 4800 on the Xeon Gold 6426Y — the Xeon Gold 6426Y supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6426Y supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 5900X) vs 8 (Xeon Gold 6426Y). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 9 5900X) vs 80 (Xeon Gold 6426Y) — the Xeon Gold 6426Y offers 56 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 9 5900X) and LGA4677 (Xeon Gold 6426Y).
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon Gold 6426Y |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | 4800+119900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+3276700% | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 80+233% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 5900X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon Gold 6426Y supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900X) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6426Y). Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K; Xeon Gold 6426Y rivals EPYC 8124P.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon Gold 6426Y |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Workstation | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 9 5900X launched at $549 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 6426Y debuted at $2145. On MSRP ($549 vs $2145), the Ryzen 9 5900X is $1596 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 9 5900X delivers 71.0 pts/$ vs 17.7 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6426Y — making the Ryzen 9 5900X the 120.2% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon Gold 6426Y |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $549-74% | $2145 |
| Performance per Dollar | 71.0+301% | 17.7 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












