
Ryzen 9 5900X
Popular choices:

Xeon Silver 4108
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +207.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+481.8% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 11 MB).
- ✅Delivers 222.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 71.0 vs 22.0 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $417 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌31.7% HIGHER MSRP$549 MSRPvs$417 MSRP
- ❌23.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 85W.
Xeon Silver 4108
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $132 less on MSRP ($417 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 85W instead of 105W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (9,177 vs 38,955).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (11 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 22.0 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($417 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Xeon Silver 4108
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +207.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+481.8% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 11 MB).
- ✅Delivers 222.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 71.0 vs 22.0 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $417 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $132 less on MSRP ($417 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 85W instead of 105W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌31.7% HIGHER MSRP$549 MSRPvs$417 MSRP
- ❌23.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 85W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (9,177 vs 38,955).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (11 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 22.0 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($417 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 5900X better than Xeon Silver 4108?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon Silver 4108 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 291 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 243 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 307 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 192 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 157 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 193 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon Silver 4108 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 772 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 647 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 508 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 450 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 619 FPS | 110 FPS |
| medium | 536 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 443 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 364 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 58 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon Silver 4108 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 832 FPS | 229 FPS |
| medium | 645 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 229 FPS |
| ultra | 459 FPS | 229 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 721 FPS | 229 FPS |
| medium | 565 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 229 FPS |
| ultra | 407 FPS | 229 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 511 FPS | 229 FPS |
| medium | 421 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 374 FPS | 229 FPS |
| ultra | 308 FPS | 229 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon Silver 4108 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 974 FPS | 229 FPS |
| medium | 974 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 934 FPS | 229 FPS |
| ultra | 826 FPS | 229 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 959 FPS | 229 FPS |
| medium | 843 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 726 FPS | 229 FPS |
| ultra | 617 FPS | 229 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 694 FPS | 229 FPS |
| medium | 621 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 541 FPS | 229 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 229 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 5900X and Xeon Silver 4108


Ryzen 9 5900X
Ryzen 9 5900X
The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.

Xeon Silver 4108
Xeon Silver 4108
The Xeon Silver 4108 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 11 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 9,177 points. Launch price was $417.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 5900X packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4108 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 9 5900X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X versus 3 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4108 — a 46.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X (base: 3.7 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Ryzen 9 5900X uses the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4108 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 5900X scores 38,955 against the Xeon Silver 4108's 9,177 — a 123.7% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X. L3 cache: 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900X vs 11 MB on the Xeon Silver 4108.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon Silver 4108 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24+50% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+60% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+106% | 1.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB+482% | 11 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 8 MB+1500% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 38,955+324% | 9,177 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 21,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,174 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,888 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 5900X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Silver 4108 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon Silver 4108 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900X) / not specified (Xeon Silver 4108). Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon Silver 4108 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Workstation | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 9 5900X launched at $549 MSRP, while the Xeon Silver 4108 debuted at $417. On MSRP ($549 vs $417), the Xeon Silver 4108 is $132 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 9 5900X delivers 71.0 pts/$ vs 22.0 pts/$ for the Xeon Silver 4108 — making the Ryzen 9 5900X the 105.3% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon Silver 4108 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $549 | $417-24% |
| Performance per Dollar | 71.0+223% | 22.0 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2017 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












