PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 9 5900X

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +56.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+433.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 12 MB).
✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌
115.3% HIGHER MSRP
$549 MSRPvs$255 MSRP
❌31.3% higher power demand at 105W vs 80W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Xeon W-1350 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Xeon W-1350.

Xeon W-1350

2021

Why buy it

✅Costs $294 less on MSRP ($255 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
✅Draws 80W instead of 105W, a 25W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics P750, while Ryzen 9 5900X needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 9 5900X.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (9,104 vs 11,888).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 64 MB).

Ryzen 9 5900X

2020

Xeon W-1350

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +56.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+433.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 12 MB).
✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Costs $294 less on MSRP ($255 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
✅Draws 80W instead of 105W, a 25W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics P750, while Ryzen 9 5900X needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 9 5900X.

Trade-offs

❌
115.3% HIGHER MSRP
$549 MSRPvs$255 MSRP
❌31.3% higher power demand at 105W vs 80W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Xeon W-1350 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Xeon W-1350.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (9,104 vs 11,888).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 64 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 9 5900X better than Xeon W-1350?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon W-1350 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 9 5900X is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 9 5900X is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 56.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 9 5900X is the better fit. You are getting 30.6% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 433.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 9 5900X is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon W-1350 makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen 9 5900X is 115.3% more expensive on MSRP at $549 MSRP versus $255 MSRP, and it gives you a 56.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon W-1350 is also 3.6% better value on MSRP (73.5 vs 71.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon W-1350 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2020) and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 9 5900X Benchmark Check

Xeon W-1350 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 9 5900X	Xeon W-1350
1080p
low	323 FPS	246 FPS
medium	291 FPS	229 FPS
high	243 FPS	191 FPS
ultra	193 FPS	164 FPS
1440p
low	307 FPS	217 FPS
medium	248 FPS	184 FPS
high	192 FPS	148 FPS
ultra	157 FPS	130 FPS
4K
low	193 FPS	151 FPS
medium	156 FPS	128 FPS
high	115 FPS	98 FPS
ultra	103 FPS	87 FPS

Open Ryzen 9 5900X Open Xeon W-1350

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 9 5900X	Xeon W-1350
1080p
low	772 FPS	315 FPS
medium	647 FPS	267 FPS
high	508 FPS	244 FPS
ultra	450 FPS	221 FPS
1440p
low	619 FPS	280 FPS
medium	536 FPS	239 FPS
high	443 FPS	221 FPS
ultra	364 FPS	197 FPS
4K
low	365 FPS	222 FPS
medium	318 FPS	191 FPS
high	289 FPS	179 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	146 FPS

Open Ryzen 9 5900X Open Xeon W-1350

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 9 5900X	Xeon W-1350
1080p
low	832 FPS	469 FPS
medium	645 FPS	469 FPS
high	558 FPS	440 FPS
ultra	459 FPS	380 FPS
1440p
low	721 FPS	469 FPS
medium	565 FPS	463 FPS
high	488 FPS	396 FPS
ultra	407 FPS	345 FPS
4K
low	511 FPS	385 FPS
medium	421 FPS	337 FPS
high	374 FPS	293 FPS
ultra	308 FPS	242 FPS

Open Ryzen 9 5900X Open Xeon W-1350

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 9 5900X	Xeon W-1350
1080p
low	974 FPS	469 FPS
medium	974 FPS	469 FPS
high	934 FPS	469 FPS
ultra	826 FPS	469 FPS
1440p
low	959 FPS	469 FPS
medium	843 FPS	469 FPS
high	726 FPS	469 FPS
ultra	617 FPS	469 FPS
4K
low	694 FPS	469 FPS
medium	621 FPS	469 FPS
high	541 FPS	451 FPS
ultra	437 FPS	392 FPS

Open Ryzen 9 5900X Open Xeon W-1350

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 5900X and Xeon W-1350

Ryzen 9 5900X

The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.

Xeon W-1350

The Xeon W-1350 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake-S (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 18,742 points. Launch price was $255.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 9 5900X packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon W-1350 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Ryzen 9 5900X has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X versus 5 GHz on the Xeon W-1350 — a 4.1% clock advantage for the Xeon W-1350 (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Ryzen 9 5900X uses the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon W-1350 uses Rocket Lake-S (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 5900X scores 38,955 against the Xeon W-1350's 18,742 — a 70.1% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,174 vs 2,140, a 1.6% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,888 vs 9,104 (26.5% advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X). L3 cache: 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900X vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon W-1350.

Feature	Ryzen 9 5900X	Xeon W-1350
Cores / Threads	12 / 24+100%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	4.8 GHz	5 GHz+4%
Base Clock	3.7 GHz+12%	3.3 GHz
L3 Cache	64 MB+433%	12 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	512 kB (per core)
Process	7 nm, 12 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022)	Rocket Lake-S (2021)
PassMark	38,955+108%	18,742
Cinebench R23 Multi	21,000	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,174+2%	2,140
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,888+31%	9,104

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 9 5900X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-1350 uses LGA1200 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 9 5900X) vs 20 (Xeon W-1350) — the Ryzen 9 5900X offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 9 5900X) and W580,C252,C256 (Xeon W-1350).

Feature	Ryzen 9 5900X	Xeon W-1350
Socket	AM4	LGA1200
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	24+20%	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Xeon W-1350 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900X) vs Yes (Xeon W-1350). The Xeon W-1350 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics P750), while the Ryzen 9 5900X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K.

Feature	Ryzen 9 5900X	Xeon W-1350
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	UHD Graphics P750
Unlocked	Yes	—
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V	Yes
Target Use	Workstation	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 9 5900X launched at $549 MSRP, while the Xeon W-1350 debuted at $255. On MSRP ($549 vs $255), the Xeon W-1350 is $294 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 9 5900X delivers 71.0 pts/$ vs 73.5 pts/$ for the Xeon W-1350 — making the Xeon W-1350 the 3.5% better value option.