
Ryzen 9 5900X
Popular choices:

Xeon W-1370
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +41.2% higher average FPS across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌70% HIGHER MSRP$549 MSRPvs$323 MSRP
- ❌31.3% higher power demand at 105W vs 80W.
Xeon W-1370
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $226 less on MSRP ($323 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 105W, a 25W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,948 vs 38,955).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 64 MB).
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Xeon W-1370
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +41.2% higher average FPS across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $226 less on MSRP ($323 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 105W, a 25W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌70% HIGHER MSRP$549 MSRPvs$323 MSRP
- ❌31.3% higher power demand at 105W vs 80W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,948 vs 38,955).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 64 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 5900X better than Xeon W-1370?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon W-1370 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 246 FPS |
| medium | 291 FPS | 231 FPS |
| high | 243 FPS | 192 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 165 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 307 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 184 FPS |
| high | 192 FPS | 148 FPS |
| ultra | 157 FPS | 130 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 193 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 86 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon W-1370 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 772 FPS | 406 FPS |
| medium | 647 FPS | 343 FPS |
| high | 508 FPS | 306 FPS |
| ultra | 450 FPS | 274 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 619 FPS | 363 FPS |
| medium | 536 FPS | 315 FPS |
| high | 443 FPS | 278 FPS |
| ultra | 364 FPS | 239 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 241 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 208 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 176 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon W-1370 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 832 FPS | 574 FPS |
| medium | 645 FPS | 527 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 453 FPS |
| ultra | 459 FPS | 391 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 721 FPS | 574 FPS |
| medium | 565 FPS | 490 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 415 FPS |
| ultra | 407 FPS | 361 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 511 FPS | 421 FPS |
| medium | 421 FPS | 365 FPS |
| high | 374 FPS | 325 FPS |
| ultra | 308 FPS | 276 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon W-1370 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 974 FPS | 574 FPS |
| medium | 974 FPS | 574 FPS |
| high | 934 FPS | 574 FPS |
| ultra | 826 FPS | 574 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 959 FPS | 574 FPS |
| medium | 843 FPS | 574 FPS |
| high | 726 FPS | 574 FPS |
| ultra | 617 FPS | 552 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 694 FPS | 559 FPS |
| medium | 621 FPS | 507 FPS |
| high | 541 FPS | 452 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 394 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 5900X and Xeon W-1370


Ryzen 9 5900X
Ryzen 9 5900X
The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.

Xeon W-1370
Xeon W-1370
The Xeon W-1370 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake-S (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 22,948 points. Launch price was $362.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 5900X packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon W-1370 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 9 5900X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X versus 5.1 GHz on the Xeon W-1370 — a 6.1% clock advantage for the Xeon W-1370 (base: 3.7 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Ryzen 9 5900X uses the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon W-1370 uses Rocket Lake-S (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 5900X scores 38,955 against the Xeon W-1370's 22,948 — a 51.7% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X. L3 cache: 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900X vs 16 MB (total) on the Xeon W-1370.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon W-1370 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24+50% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz | 5.1 GHz+6% |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+28% | 2.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB+300% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) | Rocket Lake-S (2021) |
| PassMark | 38,955+70% | 22,948 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 21,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,174 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,888 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 5900X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-1370 uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon W-1370 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900X) / not specified (Xeon W-1370). Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon W-1370 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Workstation | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 9 5900X launched at $549 MSRP, while the Xeon W-1370 debuted at $323. On MSRP ($549 vs $323), the Xeon W-1370 is $226 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 9 5900X delivers 71.0 pts/$ vs 71.0 pts/$ for the Xeon W-1370 — making the Xeon W-1370 the 0.1% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon W-1370 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $549 | $323-41% |
| Performance per Dollar | 71.0 | 71.0 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2021 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












