
Ryzen 9 5900X
Popular choices:

Xeon W-1370P
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +40.0% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 125W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌70% HIGHER MSRP$549 MSRPvs$323 MSRP
Xeon W-1370P
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $226 less on MSRP ($323 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,698 vs 38,955).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌19% higher power demand at 125W vs 105W.
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Xeon W-1370P
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +40.0% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 125W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $226 less on MSRP ($323 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌70% HIGHER MSRP$549 MSRPvs$323 MSRP
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,698 vs 38,955).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌19% higher power demand at 125W vs 105W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 5900X better than Xeon W-1370P?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon W-1370P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 291 FPS | 241 FPS |
| high | 243 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 307 FPS | 227 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 192 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 157 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 193 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 88 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon W-1370P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 772 FPS | 422 FPS |
| medium | 647 FPS | 355 FPS |
| high | 508 FPS | 315 FPS |
| ultra | 450 FPS | 284 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 619 FPS | 375 FPS |
| medium | 536 FPS | 326 FPS |
| high | 443 FPS | 288 FPS |
| ultra | 364 FPS | 250 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 251 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 224 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 217 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 185 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon W-1370P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 832 FPS | 592 FPS |
| medium | 645 FPS | 537 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 461 FPS |
| ultra | 459 FPS | 398 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 721 FPS | 592 FPS |
| medium | 565 FPS | 497 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 421 FPS |
| ultra | 407 FPS | 366 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 511 FPS | 427 FPS |
| medium | 421 FPS | 370 FPS |
| high | 374 FPS | 330 FPS |
| ultra | 308 FPS | 280 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon W-1370P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 974 FPS | 592 FPS |
| medium | 974 FPS | 592 FPS |
| high | 934 FPS | 592 FPS |
| ultra | 826 FPS | 592 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 959 FPS | 592 FPS |
| medium | 843 FPS | 592 FPS |
| high | 726 FPS | 592 FPS |
| ultra | 617 FPS | 592 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 694 FPS | 592 FPS |
| medium | 621 FPS | 576 FPS |
| high | 541 FPS | 515 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 5900X and Xeon W-1370P


Ryzen 9 5900X
Ryzen 9 5900X
The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.

Xeon W-1370P
Xeon W-1370P
The Xeon W-1370P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake-S (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 23,698 points. Launch price was $428.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 5900X packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon W-1370P offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 9 5900X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X versus 5.2 GHz on the Xeon W-1370P — a 8% clock advantage for the Xeon W-1370P (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Ryzen 9 5900X uses the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon W-1370P uses Rocket Lake-S (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 5900X scores 38,955 against the Xeon W-1370P's 23,698 — a 48.7% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X. L3 cache: 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900X vs 16 MB (total) on the Xeon W-1370P.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon W-1370P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24+50% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz | 5.2 GHz+8% |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+3% | 3.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB+300% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) | Rocket Lake-S (2021) |
| PassMark | 38,955+64% | 23,698 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 21,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,174 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,888 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 5900X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-1370P uses LGA1200 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon W-1370P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900X) / not specified (Xeon W-1370P). Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon W-1370P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Workstation | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 9 5900X launched at $549 MSRP, while the Xeon W-1370P debuted at $323. On MSRP ($549 vs $323), the Xeon W-1370P is $226 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 9 5900X delivers 71.0 pts/$ vs 73.4 pts/$ for the Xeon W-1370P — making the Xeon W-1370P the 3.3% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon W-1370P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $549 | $323-41% |
| Performance per Dollar | 71.0 | 73.4+3% |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2021 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












