Ryzen 9 5900X
Xeon W-3175X
Ryzen 9 5900X vs Xeon W-3175X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 9 5900X vs Xeon W-3175X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 9 5900X vs Xeon W-3175X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+66.2% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 39 MB).
- ✅Costs $2,450 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 361.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 71.0 vs 15.4 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 255W, a 150W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (21,000 vs 31,350).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-3175X, which brings 28 cores / 56 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon W-3175X
2018Why buy it
- ✅+49.3% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 28 cores / 56 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (39 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.4 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($2,999 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ❌142.9% higher power demand at 255W vs 105W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 5900X better than Xeon W-3175X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 9 5900X vs Xeon W-3175X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Ryzen 9 5900X
The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.
Xeon W-3175X
The Xeon W-3175X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 December 2018 (6 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 38.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 255 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 46,125 points. Launch price was $2,999.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 5900X packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon W-3175X offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the Xeon W-3175X has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon W-3175X — a 23.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Ryzen 9 5900X uses the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon W-3175X uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 5900X scores 38,955 against the Xeon W-3175X's 46,125 — a 16.9% lead for the Xeon W-3175X. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 21,000 vs 31,350 (39.5% advantage for the Xeon W-3175X). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,174 vs 1,467, a 38.8% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,888 vs 17,358 (37.4% advantage for the Xeon W-3175X). L3 cache: 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900X vs 38.5 MB (total) on the Xeon W-3175X.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon W-3175X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24 | 28 / 56+133% |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+26% | 3.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+19% | 3.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB+66% | 38.5 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+51100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 38,955 | 46,125+18% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 21,000 | 31,350+49% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,174+48% | 1,467 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,888 | 17,358+46% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 5900X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-3175X uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 5900X versus DDR4-2666 on the Xeon W-3175X — the Ryzen 9 5900X supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-3175X supports up to 512 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 5900X) vs 6 (Xeon W-3175X). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 9 5900X) vs 48 (Xeon W-3175X) — the Xeon W-3175X offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 9 5900X) and Intel C621 (Xeon W-3175X).
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon W-3175X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200+20% | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 512 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 6+200% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 48+100% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Xeon W-3175X supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900X) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon W-3175X). Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon W-3175X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Workstation | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen 9 5900X was priced at $549, while the Xeon W-3175X came in at $2999. On launch pricing ($549 vs $2999), Ryzen 9 5900X was $2450 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 9 5900X delivers 71.0 pts/$ vs 15.4 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3175X — making the Ryzen 9 5900X the 128.7% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon W-3175X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $549-82% | $2999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 71.0+361% | 15.4 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2018 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen 9 5900X and Xeon W-3175X
