PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 9 5900X

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.1% higher average FPS across 40 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+190.9% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 22 MB).
✅Costs $1,650 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $2,199 MSRP).
✅Delivers 401.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 71.0 vs 14.1 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $2,199 MSRP).
✅Draws 105W instead of 205W, a 100W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-3245, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon W-3245

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 40 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (18,000 vs 21,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (22 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.1 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($2,199 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
❌95.2% higher power demand at 205W vs 105W.

Ryzen 9 5900X

2020

Xeon W-3245

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.1% higher average FPS across 40 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+190.9% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 22 MB).
✅Costs $1,650 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $2,199 MSRP).
✅Delivers 401.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 71.0 vs 14.1 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $2,199 MSRP).
✅Draws 105W instead of 205W, a 100W reduction.

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-3245, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 40 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (18,000 vs 21,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (22 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.1 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($2,199 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
❌95.2% higher power demand at 205W vs 105W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 9 5900X better than Xeon W-3245?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon W-3245 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 9 5900X is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 9 5900X is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 14.1% more average FPS across 40 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 9 5900X is the better fit. You are getting 16.7% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 190.9% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 22 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 9 5900X is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 9 5900X is $1,650 cheaper on MSRP at $549 MSRP versus $2,199 MSRP, and it gives you a 14.1% average FPS lead across 40 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 401.9% better value on MSRP (71.0 vs 14.1 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 9 5900X is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2019), 190.9% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 22 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 24 threads instead of 16/32. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 9 5900X Benchmark Check

Xeon W-3245 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 9 5900X	Xeon W-3245
1080p
low	323 FPS	185 FPS
medium	291 FPS	150 FPS
high	243 FPS	123 FPS
ultra	193 FPS	98 FPS
1440p
low	307 FPS	148 FPS
medium	248 FPS	117 FPS
high	192 FPS	96 FPS
ultra	157 FPS	78 FPS
4K
low	193 FPS	82 FPS
medium	156 FPS	70 FPS
high	115 FPS	56 FPS
ultra	103 FPS	44 FPS

Open Ryzen 9 5900X Open Xeon W-3245

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 9 5900X	Xeon W-3245
1080p
low	772 FPS	531 FPS
medium	647 FPS	447 FPS
high	508 FPS	372 FPS
ultra	450 FPS	335 FPS
1440p
low	619 FPS	461 FPS
medium	536 FPS	399 FPS
high	443 FPS	336 FPS
ultra	364 FPS	290 FPS
4K
low	365 FPS	287 FPS
medium	318 FPS	248 FPS
high	289 FPS	228 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	199 FPS

Open Ryzen 9 5900X Open Xeon W-3245

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 9 5900X	Xeon W-3245
1080p
low	832 FPS	777 FPS
medium	645 FPS	777 FPS
high	558 FPS	777 FPS
ultra	459 FPS	777 FPS
1440p
low	721 FPS	777 FPS
medium	565 FPS	715 FPS
high	488 FPS	677 FPS
ultra	407 FPS	603 FPS
4K
low	511 FPS	524 FPS
medium	421 FPS	428 FPS
high	374 FPS	387 FPS
ultra	308 FPS	314 FPS

Open Ryzen 9 5900X Open Xeon W-3245

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 9 5900X	Xeon W-3245
1080p
low	974 FPS	777 FPS
medium	974 FPS	777 FPS
high	934 FPS	777 FPS
ultra	826 FPS	753 FPS
1440p
low	959 FPS	777 FPS
medium	843 FPS	777 FPS
high	726 FPS	696 FPS
ultra	617 FPS	601 FPS
4K
low	694 FPS	646 FPS
medium	621 FPS	566 FPS
high	541 FPS	504 FPS
ultra	437 FPS	437 FPS

Open Ryzen 9 5900X Open Xeon W-3245

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 5900X and Xeon W-3245

Ryzen 9 5900X

The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.

Xeon W-3245

The Xeon W-3245 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 31,089 points. Launch price was $1,999.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 9 5900X packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon W-3245 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon W-3245 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon W-3245 — a 4.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen 9 5900X uses the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon W-3245 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 5900X scores 38,955 against the Xeon W-3245's 31,089 — a 22.5% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 21,000 vs 18,000 (15.4% advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,174 vs 1,353, a 46.6% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,888 vs 11,698 (1.6% advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X). L3 cache: 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900X vs 22 MB on the Xeon W-3245.

Feature	Ryzen 9 5900X	Xeon W-3245
Cores / Threads	12 / 24	16 / 32+33%
Boost Clock	4.8 GHz+4%	4.6 GHz
Base Clock	3.7 GHz+16%	3.2 GHz
L3 Cache	64 MB+191%	22 MB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	16 MB+3100%
Process	7 nm, 12 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022)	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark	38,955+25%	31,089
Cinebench R23 Multi	21,000+17%	18,000
Geekbench 6 Single	2,174+61%	1,353
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,888+2%	11,698

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 9 5900X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-3245 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Xeon W-3245 supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 5900X) vs 6 (Xeon W-3245). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 9 5900X) vs 64 (Xeon W-3245) — the Xeon W-3245 offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 9 5900X) and C621 (Xeon W-3245).

Feature	Ryzen 9 5900X	Xeon W-3245
Socket	AM4	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	1024 GB+700%
RAM Channels	2	6+200%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	24	64+167%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 9 5900X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon W-3245 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900X) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon W-3245). Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation, Xeon W-3245 targets Professional Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K; Xeon W-3245 rivals Threadripper 2950X.

Feature	Ryzen 9 5900X	Xeon W-3245
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Workstation	Professional Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 9 5900X launched at $549 MSRP, while the Xeon W-3245 debuted at $2199. On MSRP ($549 vs $2199), the Ryzen 9 5900X is $1650 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 9 5900X delivers 71.0 pts/$ vs 14.1 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3245 — making the Ryzen 9 5900X the 133.5% better value option.