Ryzen 9 5900X vs Xeon W-3375

Ryzen 9 5900X vs Xeon W-3375 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 9 5900X

12 / 24

38,955

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Xeon W-3375

38 / 76

59,091

+51.7%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 9 5900X vs Xeon W-3375 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 9 5900X vs Xeon W-3375: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 9 5900X

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +21.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $4,402 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $4,951 MSRP).
✅Delivers 494.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 71.0 vs 11.9 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $4,951 MSRP).
✅Draws 105W instead of 270W, a 165W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (11,888 vs 17,713).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-3375, which brings 38 cores / 76 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon W-3375

2021

Why buy it

✅+49% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 38 cores / 76 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.9 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($4,951 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
❌157.1% higher power demand at 270W vs 105W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 9 5900X better than Xeon W-3375?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon W-3375 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 9 5900X is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-3375 is the stronger fit. You are getting 49% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 38 cores and 76 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 9 5900X is the better buy right now. Ryzen 9 5900X comes in $4,402 cheaper on MSRP at $549 MSRP versus $4,951 MSRP, and it still gives you a 21.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon W-3375 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 49% better Geekbench multi-core. It is also 494.5% better value on MSRP (71.0 vs 11.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon W-3375 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2020), more multi-core headroom with 38 cores / 76 threads instead of 12/24, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Ryzen 9 5900X vs Xeon W-3375 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 9 5900X

The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.

Xeon W-3375

The Xeon W-3375 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-07-29. It is based on the Ice Lake-W (2021) architecture. It features 38 cores and 76 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 57 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 59,091 points. Launch price was $4,499.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 9 5900X packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon W-3375 offers 38 cores / 76 threads — the Xeon W-3375 has 26 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X versus 4 GHz on the Xeon W-3375 — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X (base: 3.7 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Ryzen 9 5900X uses the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon W-3375 uses Ice Lake-W (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 5900X scores 38,955 against the Xeon W-3375's 59,091 — a 41.1% lead for the Xeon W-3375. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,174 vs 1,818, a 17.8% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,888 vs 17,713 (39.4% advantage for the Xeon W-3375). L3 cache: 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900X vs 57 MB (total) on the Xeon W-3375.

Feature	Ryzen 9 5900X	Xeon W-3375
Cores / Threads	12 / 24	38 / 76+217%
Boost Clock	4.8 GHz+20%	4 GHz
Base Clock	3.7 GHz+48%	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	64 MB+12%	57 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+51100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	7 nm, 12 nm-30%	10 nm
Architecture	Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022)	Ice Lake-W (2021)
PassMark	38,955	59,091+52%
Cinebench R23 Multi	21,000	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,174+20%	1,818
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,888	17,713+49%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 9 5900X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-3375 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Xeon W-3375 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 3100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 5900X) vs 8 (Xeon W-3375). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 9 5900X) vs 64 (Xeon W-3375) — the Xeon W-3375 offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 9 5900X) and Intel C621A (Xeon W-3375).

Feature	Ryzen 9 5900X	Xeon W-3375
Socket	AM4	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	4096 GB+3100%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	24	64+167%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 9 5900X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon W-3375 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900X) vs true (Xeon W-3375). Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K; Xeon W-3375 rivals EPYC 7543.

Feature	Ryzen 9 5900X	Xeon W-3375
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V	true
Target Use	Workstation	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen 9 5900X was priced at $549, while the Xeon W-3375 came in at $4951. On launch pricing ($549 vs $4951), Ryzen 9 5900X was $4402 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 9 5900X delivers 71.0 pts/$ vs 11.9 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3375 — making the Ryzen 9 5900X the 142.4% better value option.

Feature	Ryzen 9 5900X	Xeon W-3375
MSRP	$549-89%	$4951
Performance per Dollar	71.0+497%	11.9
Release Date	2020	2021

Search Ryzen 9 5900X on Amazon

Search Xeon W-3375 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.