PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 9 5900X

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +46.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+326.7% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 15 MB).
✅Delivers 99.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 71.0 vs 35.5 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $529 MSRP).
✅Draws 105W instead of 130W, a 25W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌
3.8% HIGHER MSRP
$549 MSRPvs$529 MSRP
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon w3-2425 moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Xeon w3-2425

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $20 less on MSRP ($529 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (18,776 vs 38,955).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (15 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 35.5 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($529 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
❌23.8% higher power demand at 130W vs 105W.

Ryzen 9 5900X

2020

Xeon w3-2425

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +46.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+326.7% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 15 MB).
✅Delivers 99.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 71.0 vs 35.5 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $529 MSRP).
✅Draws 105W instead of 130W, a 25W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Costs $20 less on MSRP ($529 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌
3.8% HIGHER MSRP
$549 MSRPvs$529 MSRP
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon w3-2425 moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (18,776 vs 38,955).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (15 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 35.5 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($529 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
❌23.8% higher power demand at 130W vs 105W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 9 5900X better than Xeon w3-2425?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon w3-2425 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 9 5900X is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 9 5900X is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 46.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 9 5900X is the better fit. You are getting 107.5% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 326.7% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 15 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 9 5900X is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 9 5900X is 3.8% more expensive on MSRP at $549 MSRP versus $529 MSRP, and it gives you a 46.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 99.9% better value on MSRP (71.0 vs 35.5 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon w3-2425 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2020) and a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of AM4. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 9 5900X Benchmark Check

Xeon w3-2425 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 9 5900X	Xeon w3-2425
1080p
low	323 FPS	184 FPS
medium	291 FPS	152 FPS
high	243 FPS	125 FPS
ultra	193 FPS	104 FPS
1440p
low	307 FPS	149 FPS
medium	248 FPS	120 FPS
high	192 FPS	98 FPS
ultra	157 FPS	80 FPS
4K
low	193 FPS	83 FPS
medium	156 FPS	71 FPS
high	115 FPS	57 FPS
ultra	103 FPS	45 FPS

Open Ryzen 9 5900X Open Xeon w3-2425

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 9 5900X	Xeon w3-2425
1080p
low	772 FPS	357 FPS
medium	647 FPS	295 FPS
high	508 FPS	261 FPS
ultra	450 FPS	226 FPS
1440p
low	619 FPS	317 FPS
medium	536 FPS	269 FPS
high	443 FPS	243 FPS
ultra	364 FPS	206 FPS
4K
low	365 FPS	248 FPS
medium	318 FPS	215 FPS
high	289 FPS	197 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	166 FPS

Open Ryzen 9 5900X Open Xeon w3-2425

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 9 5900X	Xeon w3-2425
1080p
low	832 FPS	469 FPS
medium	645 FPS	469 FPS
high	558 FPS	469 FPS
ultra	459 FPS	469 FPS
1440p
low	721 FPS	469 FPS
medium	565 FPS	469 FPS
high	488 FPS	469 FPS
ultra	407 FPS	469 FPS
4K
low	511 FPS	469 FPS
medium	421 FPS	415 FPS
high	374 FPS	354 FPS
ultra	308 FPS	280 FPS

Open Ryzen 9 5900X Open Xeon w3-2425

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 9 5900X	Xeon w3-2425
1080p
low	974 FPS	469 FPS
medium	974 FPS	469 FPS
high	934 FPS	469 FPS
ultra	826 FPS	469 FPS
1440p
low	959 FPS	469 FPS
medium	843 FPS	469 FPS
high	726 FPS	469 FPS
ultra	617 FPS	469 FPS
4K
low	694 FPS	469 FPS
medium	621 FPS	469 FPS
high	541 FPS	469 FPS
ultra	437 FPS	413 FPS

Open Ryzen 9 5900X Open Xeon w3-2425

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 5900X and Xeon w3-2425

Ryzen 9 5900X

The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.

Xeon w3-2425

The Xeon w3-2425 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 18,776 points. Launch price was $529.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 9 5900X packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon w3-2425 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Ryzen 9 5900X has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X versus 4.4 GHz on the Xeon w3-2425 — a 8.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Ryzen 9 5900X uses the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon w3-2425 uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 5900X scores 38,955 against the Xeon w3-2425's 18,776 — a 69.9% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X. L3 cache: 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900X vs 15 MB on the Xeon w3-2425.

Feature	Ryzen 9 5900X	Xeon w3-2425
Cores / Threads	12 / 24+100%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	4.8 GHz+9%	4.4 GHz
Base Clock	3.7 GHz+23%	3 GHz
L3 Cache	64 MB+327%	15 MB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	2 MB (per core)+300%
Process	7 nm, 12 nm	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	38,955+107%	18,776
Cinebench R23 Multi	21,000	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,174	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,888	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 9 5900X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w3-2425 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen 9 5900X	Xeon w3-2425
Socket	AM4	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	24	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900X) / not specified (Xeon w3-2425). Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K.

Feature	Ryzen 9 5900X	Xeon w3-2425
Integrated GPU	No	—
Unlocked	Yes	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	AMD-V	—
Target Use	Workstation	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 9 5900X launched at $549 MSRP, while the Xeon w3-2425 debuted at $529. On MSRP ($549 vs $529), the Xeon w3-2425 is $20 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 9 5900X delivers 71.0 pts/$ vs 35.5 pts/$ for the Xeon w3-2425 — making the Ryzen 9 5900X the 66.6% better value option.