Ryzen 9 7845HX vs Xeon w5-3525

Ryzen 9 7845HX vs Xeon w5-3525 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 9 7845HX

12 / 24

44,940

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Xeon w5-3525

16 / 32

45,311

+0.8%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 9 7845HX vs Xeon w5-3525 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 9 7845HX vs Xeon w5-3525: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 9 7845HX

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+42.2% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 45 MB).
✅Draws 55W instead of 290W, a 235W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 610M, while Xeon w5-3525 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Xeon w5-3525.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (44,940 vs 45,311).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon w5-3525, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 112 PCIe lanes.

Xeon w5-3525

2024

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 112 PCIe lanes vs 28.
✅300% more PCIe lanes (112 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7845HX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (45 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $1,339 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 7845HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌427.3% higher power demand at 290W vs 55W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 7845HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon w5-3525 better than Ryzen 9 7845HX?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon w5-3525 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 9 7845HX is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon w5-3525 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon w5-3525 is the better buy right now. Xeon w5-3525 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $1,339 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.8% better PassMark. The compromise is that Ryzen 9 7845HX is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 6.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (33.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon w5-3525 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023) and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 12/24. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Ryzen 9 7845HX vs Xeon w5-3525 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 9 7845HX

The Ryzen 9 7845HX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on CCD = 5 nm, I/O = 6 nm process technology. Socket: FL1. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 44,940 points. Launch price was $499.

Xeon w5-3525

The Xeon w5-3525 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 290 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 45,311 points. Launch price was $1,339.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 9 7845HX packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon w5-3525 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon w5-3525 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7845HX versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w5-3525 — a 8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7845HX (base: 3 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen 9 7845HX uses the Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture (CCD = 5 nm, I/O = 6 nm), while the Xeon w5-3525 uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 7845HX scores 44,940 against the Xeon w5-3525's 45,311 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon w5-3525. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7845HX vs 45 MB on the Xeon w5-3525.

Feature	Ryzen 9 7845HX	Xeon w5-3525
Cores / Threads	12 / 24	16 / 32+33%
Boost Clock	5.2 GHz+8%	4.8 GHz
Base Clock	3 GHz	3.2 GHz+7%
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)+42%	45 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	CCD = 5 nm, I/O = 6 nm-29%	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4) (2023−2024)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	44,940	45,311
Cinebench R23 Multi	26,654	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,697	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	15,039	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 9 7845HX uses the FL1 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon w5-3525 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 9 7845HX versus 4800 on the Xeon w5-3525 — the Ryzen 9 7845HX supports 8.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon w5-3525 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 6300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 7845HX) vs 8 (Xeon w5-3525). PCIe lanes: 28 (Ryzen 9 7845HX) vs 112 (Xeon w5-3525) — the Xeon w5-3525 offers 84 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FL1 (Ryzen 9 7845HX) and W790 (Xeon w5-3525).

Feature	Ryzen 9 7845HX	Xeon w5-3525
Socket	FL1	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5200+8%	4800
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	4096 GB+6300%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	28	112+300%

🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 7845HX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon w5-3525). The Ryzen 9 7845HX includes integrated graphics (Radeon 610M), while the Xeon w5-3525 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 7845HX targets High-end Gaming / Content Creation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 7845HX rivals Core i9-13900HX; Xeon w5-3525 rivals Threadripper PRO 7955WX.