
Ryzen 9 7900
Popular choices:

Xeon Platinum 8368Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 9 7900
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +27.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $7,290 less on MSRP ($429 MSRP vs $7,719 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1756.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 112.3 vs 6.0 PassMark/$ ($429 MSRP vs $7,719 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 270W, a 205W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Platinum 8368Q, which brings 38 cores / 76 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Xeon Platinum 8368Q
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 38 cores / 76 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7900 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (46,681 vs 48,168).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.0 vs 112.3 PassMark/$ ($7,719 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ❌315.4% higher power demand at 270W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 7900 moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Ryzen 9 7900
2023Xeon Platinum 8368Q
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +27.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $7,290 less on MSRP ($429 MSRP vs $7,719 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1756.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 112.3 vs 6.0 PassMark/$ ($429 MSRP vs $7,719 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 270W, a 205W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 38 cores / 76 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Platinum 8368Q, which brings 38 cores / 76 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7900 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (46,681 vs 48,168).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.0 vs 112.3 PassMark/$ ($7,719 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ❌315.4% higher power demand at 270W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 7900 moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 7900 better than Xeon Platinum 8368Q?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 7900 | Xeon Platinum 8368Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 288 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 218 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 190 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 218 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 170 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 152 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 39 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 7900 | Xeon Platinum 8368Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 706 FPS | 496 FPS |
| medium | 599 FPS | 431 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 345 FPS |
| ultra | 389 FPS | 286 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 593 FPS | 425 FPS |
| medium | 522 FPS | 375 FPS |
| high | 406 FPS | 310 FPS |
| ultra | 322 FPS | 247 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 335 FPS | 264 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 264 FPS | 208 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 174 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 9 7900 | Xeon Platinum 8368Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 876 FPS | 960 FPS |
| medium | 699 FPS | 836 FPS |
| high | 608 FPS | 790 FPS |
| ultra | 518 FPS | 701 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 702 FPS | 759 FPS |
| medium | 562 FPS | 652 FPS |
| high | 481 FPS | 616 FPS |
| ultra | 408 FPS | 547 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 487 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 383 FPS |
| high | 372 FPS | 340 FPS |
| ultra | 312 FPS | 278 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 9 7900 | Xeon Platinum 8368Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1125 FPS | 930 FPS |
| medium | 987 FPS | 844 FPS |
| high | 860 FPS | 730 FPS |
| ultra | 765 FPS | 631 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 892 FPS | 728 FPS |
| medium | 774 FPS | 641 FPS |
| high | 677 FPS | 551 FPS |
| ultra | 580 FPS | 473 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 644 FPS | 525 FPS |
| medium | 570 FPS | 470 FPS |
| high | 503 FPS | 413 FPS |
| ultra | 434 FPS | 358 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 7900 and Xeon Platinum 8368Q


Ryzen 9 7900
Ryzen 9 7900
The Ryzen 9 7900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 48,168 points. Launch price was $429.

Xeon Platinum 8368Q
Xeon Platinum 8368Q
The Xeon Platinum 8368Q is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 38 cores and 76 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 57 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 46,681 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 7900 packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8368Q offers 38 cores / 76 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8368Q has 26 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7900 versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8368Q — a 37.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7900 (base: 3.7 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Ryzen 9 7900 uses the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8368Q uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 7900 scores 48,168 against the Xeon Platinum 8368Q's 46,681 — a 3.1% lead for the Ryzen 9 7900. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7900 vs 57 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8368Q.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 7900 | Xeon Platinum 8368Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24 | 38 / 76+217% |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+46% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+42% | 2.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total)+12% | 57 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm-50% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) | Ice Lake-SP (2021) |
| PassMark | 48,168+3% | 46,681 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 24,600 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,800 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 18,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 7900 uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8368Q uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 9 7900 versus 3200 on the Xeon Platinum 8368Q — the Xeon Platinum 8368Q supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8368Q supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 7900) vs 8 (Xeon Platinum 8368Q). PCIe lanes: 28 (Ryzen 9 7900) vs 128 (Xeon Platinum 8368Q) — the Xeon Platinum 8368Q offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD X670E,AMD X670,AMD B650E,AMD B650,AMD A620 (Ryzen 9 7900) and SP3,C621A (Xeon Platinum 8368Q).
| Feature | Ryzen 9 7900 | Xeon Platinum 8368Q |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | LGA4189 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200 | 3200+63900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+3276700% | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 128+357% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 7900 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: true (Ryzen 9 7900) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8368Q). The Ryzen 9 7900 includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics (Raphael)), while the Xeon Platinum 8368Q requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 7900 rivals Core i9-13900; Xeon Platinum 8368Q rivals Xeon Platinum 8362.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 7900 | Xeon Platinum 8368Q |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Graphics (Raphael) | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 9 7900 launched at $429 MSRP, while the Xeon Platinum 8368Q debuted at $7719. On MSRP ($429 vs $7719), the Ryzen 9 7900 is $7290 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 9 7900 delivers 112.3 pts/$ vs 6.0 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8368Q — making the Ryzen 9 7900 the 179.6% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 7900 | Xeon Platinum 8368Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $429-94% | $7719 |
| Performance per Dollar | 112.3+1772% | 6.0 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2021 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












