EPYC 4464P vs Ryzen 9 7900

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 4464P vs Ryzen 9 7900 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 4464P vs Ryzen 9 7900: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 4464P

2024

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7900 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (47,185 vs 48,168).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 9 7900.

Ryzen 9 7900

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike EPYC 4464P.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 9 7900 better than EPYC 4464P?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 4464P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 9 7900 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 9 7900 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 9 7900 is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.1% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 9 7900 is the better buy right now. Ryzen 9 7900 comes in in basically the same MSRP band at $429 MSRP versus $429 MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 2.1% better value on MSRP (112.3 vs 110.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 4464P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

EPYC 4464P vs Ryzen 9 7900 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 4464P

The EPYC 4464P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 47,185 points. Launch price was $399.

Ryzen 9 7900

The Ryzen 9 7900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 48,168 points. Launch price was $429.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the EPYC 4464P and Ryzen 9 7900 share an identical 12-core/24-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the EPYC 4464P versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7900 — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The EPYC 4464P uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen 9 7900 uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4464P scores 47,185 against the Ryzen 9 7900's 48,168 — a 2.1% lead for the Ryzen 9 7900. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 4464P vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7900.

Feature	EPYC 4464P	Ryzen 9 7900
Cores / Threads	12 / 24	12 / 24
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz	5.4 GHz
Base Clock	3.7 GHz	3.7 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)	64 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	5 nm	5 nm
Architecture	Raphael (2023−2025)	Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023)
PassMark	47,185	48,168+2%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	24,600
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,800
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	18,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the AM5 socket with PCIe 4.0. Both support up to 5200 memory speed. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 28 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AM5,FL1 (EPYC 4464P) and AMD X670E,AMD X670,AMD B650E,AMD B650,AMD A620 (Ryzen 9 7900).

Feature	EPYC 4464P	Ryzen 9 7900
Socket	AM5	AM5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	5200	DDR5-5200
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	28	28

🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 4464P) vs true (Ryzen 9 7900). Both include integrated graphics — AMD Radeon Graphics (EPYC 4464P) and Radeon Graphics (Raphael) (Ryzen 9 7900) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 4464P rivals Core i9-13900; Ryzen 9 7900 rivals Core i9-13900.

Feature	EPYC 4464P	Ryzen 9 7900
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	AMD Radeon Graphics	Radeon Graphics (Raphael)
Unlocked	Yes	Yes
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V	true

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 4464P was priced at $429, while the Ryzen 9 7900 came in at $429. On launch pricing ($429 vs $429), Ryzen 9 7900 was $0 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4464P delivers 110.0 pts/$ vs 112.3 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 7900 — making the Ryzen 9 7900 the 2.1% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 4464P	Ryzen 9 7900
MSRP	$429	$429
Performance per Dollar	110.0	112.3+2%
Release Date	2024	2023

Search EPYC 4464P on Amazon

Search Ryzen 9 7900 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.