EPYC 4464P
VS
EPYC 9115

EPYC 4464P vs EPYC 9115

AMD

EPYC 4464P

12 Cores24 Thrd105 WWMax: 5.4 GHz2024
VS
AMD

EPYC 9115

16 Cores32 Thrd125 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2024

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 4464P

#50
Xeon Gold 6238R
MSRP: $2612|Avg: N/A
133%
#54
EPYC 4465P
MSRP: $399|Avg: $399
114%
#55
Ryzen 5 PRO 7645
MSRP: $229|Avg: $192
109%
#56
Xeon E5-4667 v3
MSRP: $128|Avg: $128
109%
#59
Ryzen 9 PRO 7945
MSRP: $409|Avg: $450
104%
#60
Xeon Platinum 8571N
MSRP: $599|Avg: $418
104%
#61
Xeon Platinum 8270
MSRP: $7405|Avg: N/A
104%
#62
EPYC 4464P
MSRP: $429|Avg: $450
100%
#63
EPYC 4345P
MSRP: $329|Avg: $329
99%
#64
EPYC 4344P
MSRP: $329|Avg: $314
98%
#65
EPYC 4364P
MSRP: $399|Avg: $334
93%
#66
EPYC 4585PX
MSRP: $699|Avg: $826
92%
#67
EPYC 4545P
MSRP: $549|Avg: $595
90%
#71
Ryzen 7 PRO 7745
MSRP: $400|Avg: $343
79%
#73
EPYC 4484PX
MSRP: $599|Avg: $599
77%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9115

#115
Xeon W-1370
MSRP: $323|Avg: $323
107%
#119
Xeon 6505P
MSRP: $563|Avg: $563
105%
#130
EPYC 9115
MSRP: $726|Avg: $726
100%
#131
EPYC 74F3
MSRP: $913|Avg: $824
100%
#143
Xeon W-1350P
MSRP: $311|Avg: $250
95%
#145
Xeon 6511P
MSRP: $815|Avg: $815
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The EPYC 4464P leads in gaming performance. However, the EPYC 9115 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 2.4% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightEPYC 4464PEPYC 9115
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($450)
⚠️ Higher cost ($726)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Raphael (2023−2025) / 5 nm)
✨ Modern (Turin (2024) / 4 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: The EPYC 4464P leads not only in performance but also in value. It is effectively 38% cheaper ($450 vs $726) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightEPYC 4464PEPYC 9115
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+57%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($450)
⚠️ Higher cost ($726)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 4464P and EPYC 9115

AMD

EPYC 4464P

The EPYC 4464P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 47,185 points. Launch price was $399.

AMD

EPYC 9115

The EPYC 9115 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 48,343 points. Launch price was $726.

Processing Power

The EPYC 4464P packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the EPYC 9115 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 9115 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the EPYC 4464P versus 4.1 GHz on the EPYC 9115 — a 27.4% clock advantage for the EPYC 4464P (base: 3.7 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The EPYC 4464P uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the EPYC 9115 uses Turin (2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4464P scores 47,185 against the EPYC 9115's 48,343 — a 2.4% lead for the EPYC 9115. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 4464P vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 9115.

FeatureEPYC 4464PEPYC 9115
Cores / Threads
12 / 24
16 / 32+33%
Boost Clock
5.4 GHz+32%
4.1 GHz
Base Clock
3.7 GHz+42%
2.6 GHz
L3 Cache
32 MB (total)
64 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
1 MB (per core)
Process
5 nm
4 nm-20%
Architecture
Raphael (2023−2025)
Turin (2024)
PassMark
47,185
48,343+2%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 4464P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 9115 uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5200 on the EPYC 4464P versus 4800 on the EPYC 9115 — the EPYC 4464P supports 8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9115 supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 128 191.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4464P) vs 12 (EPYC 9115). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4464P) vs 128 (EPYC 9115) — the EPYC 9115 offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM5,FL1 (EPYC 4464P) and SP5 (EPYC 9115).

FeatureEPYC 4464PEPYC 9115
Socket
AM5
SP5
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed
5200+8%
4800
Max RAM Capacity
128
6144+4700%
RAM Channels
2
12+500%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
28
128+357%
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the EPYC 4464P has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V virtualization. The EPYC 4464P includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the EPYC 9115 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 4464P rivals Core i9-13900; EPYC 9115 rivals Xeon Platinum 8468X.

FeatureEPYC 4464PEPYC 9115
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
AMD Radeon Graphics
None
Unlocked
Yes
No
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V
VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V
💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 4464P launched at $429 MSRP, while the EPYC 9115 debuted at $726. At current prices ($450 vs $726), the EPYC 4464P is $276 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4464P delivers 104.9 pts/$ vs 66.6 pts/$ for the EPYC 9115 — making the EPYC 4464P the 44.6% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 4464PEPYC 9115
MSRP
$429-41%
$726
Avg Price (30d)
$450-38%
$726
Performance per Dollar
104.9+58%
66.6
Release Date
2024
2024