EPYC 4464P vs EPYC 9224

CPU

GPU

EPYC 4464P

12 Cores24 Thrd105 WWMax: 5.4 GHz2024

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 9224

24 Cores48 Thrd200 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2022

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 4464P vs EPYC 9224 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 4464P

12 / 24

47,185

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

EPYC 9224

24 / 48

48,573

+2.9%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 4464P vs EPYC 9224 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 4464P vs EPYC 9224: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 4464P

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +21.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $1,396 less on MSRP ($429 MSRP vs $1,825 MSRP).
✅Delivers 313.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 110.0 vs 26.6 PassMark/$ ($429 MSRP vs $1,825 MSRP).
✅Draws 105W instead of 200W, a 95W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics, while EPYC 9224 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (47,185 vs 48,573).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).

EPYC 9224

2022

Why buy it

✅+2.9% higher PassMark.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4464P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 26.6 vs 110.0 PassMark/$ ($1,825 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
❌90.5% higher power demand at 200W vs 105W.
❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4464P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 4464P better than EPYC 9224?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 4464P is ahead with a 21.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9224 pulls ahead with 2.9% better PassMark. EPYC 9224 also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9224 is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.9% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 4464P is the better buy right now. EPYC 4464P comes in $1,396 cheaper on MSRP at $429 MSRP versus $1,825 MSRP, and it still gives you a 21.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that EPYC 9224 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 2.9% better PassMark. It is also 313.3% better value on MSRP (110.0 vs 26.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 4464P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2022). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 4464P vs EPYC 9224 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 4464P

The EPYC 4464P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 47,185 points. Launch price was $399.

EPYC 9224

The EPYC 9224 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 48,573 points. Launch price was $1,825.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 4464P packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the EPYC 9224 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the EPYC 9224 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the EPYC 4464P versus 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9224 — a 37.4% clock advantage for the EPYC 4464P (base: 3.7 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The EPYC 4464P uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the EPYC 9224 uses Genoa (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4464P scores 47,185 against the EPYC 9224's 48,573 — a 2.9% lead for the EPYC 9224. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 4464P vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 9224.

Feature	EPYC 4464P	EPYC 9224
Cores / Threads	12 / 24	24 / 48+100%
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz+46%	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	3.7 GHz+48%	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)	64 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	5 nm	5 nm, 6 nm
Architecture	Raphael (2023−2025)	Genoa (2022−2023)
PassMark	47,185	48,573+3%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 4464P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 9224 uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5200 on the EPYC 4464P versus 4800 on the EPYC 9224 — the EPYC 4464P supports 8.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9224 supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 128 — 4700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4464P) vs 12 (EPYC 9224). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4464P) vs 128 (EPYC 9224) — the EPYC 9224 offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM5,FL1 (EPYC 4464P) and SP5 (EPYC 9224).

Feature	EPYC 4464P	EPYC 9224
Socket	AM5	SP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	5200+8%	4800
Max RAM Capacity	128	6144+4700%
RAM Channels	2	12+500%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	28	128+357%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the EPYC 4464P has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V virtualization. The EPYC 4464P includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the EPYC 9224 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 4464P rivals Core i9-13900; EPYC 9224 rivals Xeon Platinum 8468X.

Feature	EPYC 4464P	EPYC 9224
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	AMD Radeon Graphics	None
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 4464P was priced at $429, while the EPYC 9224 came in at $1825. On launch pricing ($429 vs $1825), EPYC 4464P was $1396 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4464P delivers 110.0 pts/$ vs 26.6 pts/$ for the EPYC 9224 — making the EPYC 4464P the 122.1% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 4464P	EPYC 9224
MSRP	$429-76%	$1825
Performance per Dollar	110.0+314%	26.6
Release Date	2024	2022

Search EPYC 4464P on Amazon

Search EPYC 9224 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.