EPYC 4464P
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
EPYC 4464P vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 4464P vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 4464P vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 4464P
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $370 less on MSRP ($429 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 80.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 110.0 vs 61.0 PassMark/$ ($429 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 280W, a 175W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics, while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (47,185 vs 48,756).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 61.0 vs 110.0 PassMark/$ ($799 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ❌166.7% higher power demand at 280W vs 105W.
- ❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while EPYC 4464P moves to AM5 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4464P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX better than EPYC 4464P?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 4464P vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 4464P
The EPYC 4464P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 47,185 points. Launch price was $399.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 8 March 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 48,756 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The EPYC 4464P packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the EPYC 4464P versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX — a 18.2% clock advantage for the EPYC 4464P (base: 3.7 GHz vs 4 GHz). The EPYC 4464P uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX uses Chagall PRO (2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4464P scores 47,185 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX's 48,756 — a 3.3% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 4464P vs 64 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX.
| Feature | EPYC 4464P | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24 | 16 / 32+33% |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+20% | 4.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz | 4 GHz+8% |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 64 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 512K (per core)+51100% |
| Process | 5 nm-29% | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raphael (2023−2025) | Chagall PRO (2022) |
| PassMark | 47,185 | 48,756+3% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 4464P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5200 on the EPYC 4464P versus 3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX — the EPYC 4464P supports 62.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX supports up to 2048 of RAM compared to 128 — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4464P) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4464P) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM5,FL1 (EPYC 4464P) and WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX).
| Feature | EPYC 4464P | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | sWRX8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 5200+63% | 3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 | 2048+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 128+357% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V virtualization. The EPYC 4464P includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 4464P rivals Core i9-13900; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX rivals Xeon w5-3335.
| Feature | EPYC 4464P | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Graphics | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 4464P was priced at $429, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX came in at $799. On launch pricing ($429 vs $799), EPYC 4464P was $370 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4464P delivers 110.0 pts/$ vs 61.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX — making the EPYC 4464P the 57.3% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 4464P | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $429-46% | $799 |
| Performance per Dollar | 110.0+80% | 61.0 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2022 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 4464P and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
