EPYC 4464P vs EPYC 7453

CPU

GPU

EPYC 4464P

12 Cores24 Thrd105 WWMax: 5.4 GHz2024

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 7453

28 Cores56 Thrd225 WWMax: 3.45 GHz2021

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 4464P vs EPYC 7453 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 4464P

12 / 24

47,185

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

EPYC 7453

28 / 56

48,453

+2.7%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 4464P vs EPYC 7453 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 4464P vs EPYC 7453: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 4464P

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +33.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $1,141 less on MSRP ($429 MSRP vs $1,570 MSRP).
✅Delivers 256.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 110.0 vs 30.9 PassMark/$ ($429 MSRP vs $1,570 MSRP).
✅Draws 105W instead of 225W, a 120W reduction.
✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (47,185 vs 48,453).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).

EPYC 7453

2021

Why buy it

✅+2.7% higher PassMark.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4464P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 30.9 vs 110.0 PassMark/$ ($1,570 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
❌114.3% higher power demand at 225W vs 105W.
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while EPYC 4464P moves to AM5 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4464P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 4464P better than EPYC 7453?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 4464P is ahead with a 33.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7453 pulls ahead with 2.7% better PassMark. EPYC 7453 also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7453 is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.7% better PassMark, backed by 28 cores and 56 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 4464P is the better buy right now. EPYC 4464P comes in $1,141 cheaper on MSRP at $429 MSRP versus $1,570 MSRP, and it still gives you a 33.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that EPYC 7453 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 2.7% better PassMark. It is also 256.4% better value on MSRP (110.0 vs 30.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 4464P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2021) and a healthier platform with AM5 and DDR5 instead of SP3. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 4464P vs EPYC 7453 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 4464P

The EPYC 4464P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 47,185 points. Launch price was $399.

EPYC 7453

The EPYC 7453 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.75 GHz, with boost up to 3.45 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 48,453 points. Launch price was $1,570.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 4464P packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the EPYC 7453 offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the EPYC 7453 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the EPYC 4464P versus 3.45 GHz on the EPYC 7453 — a 44.1% clock advantage for the EPYC 4464P (base: 3.7 GHz vs 2.75 GHz). The EPYC 4464P uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the EPYC 7453 uses Milan (2021−2023) (7 nm+). In PassMark, the EPYC 4464P scores 47,185 against the EPYC 7453's 48,453 — a 2.7% lead for the EPYC 7453. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 4464P vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7453.

Feature	EPYC 4464P	EPYC 7453
Cores / Threads	12 / 24	28 / 56+133%
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz+57%	3.45 GHz
Base Clock	3.7 GHz+35%	2.75 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)	64 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+100%	512 kB (per core)
Process	5 nm-29%	7 nm+
Architecture	Raphael (2023−2025)	Milan (2021−2023)
PassMark	47,185	48,453+3%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 4464P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 7453 uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5200 on the EPYC 4464P versus 3200 on the EPYC 7453 — the EPYC 4464P supports 62.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7453 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 128 — 3100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4464P) vs 8 (EPYC 7453). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4464P) vs 128 (EPYC 7453) — the EPYC 7453 offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM5,FL1 (EPYC 4464P) and SP3,C621A (EPYC 7453).

Feature	EPYC 4464P	EPYC 7453
Socket	AM5	SP3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	5200+63%	3200
Max RAM Capacity	128	4096+3100%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	28	128+357%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the EPYC 4464P has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 4464P) vs VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 7453). The EPYC 4464P includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the EPYC 7453 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 4464P rivals Core i9-13900; EPYC 7453 rivals Xeon Platinum 8362.

Feature	EPYC 4464P	EPYC 7453
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	AMD Radeon Graphics	None
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 4464P was priced at $429, while the EPYC 7453 came in at $1570. On launch pricing ($429 vs $1570), EPYC 4464P was $1141 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4464P delivers 110.0 pts/$ vs 30.9 pts/$ for the EPYC 7453 — making the EPYC 4464P the 112.4% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 4464P	EPYC 7453
MSRP	$429-73%	$1570
Performance per Dollar	110.0+256%	30.9
Release Date	2024	2021

Search EPYC 4464P on Amazon

Search EPYC 7453 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.