Core i9-14900F vs EPYC 4464P

Core i9-14900F vs EPYC 4464P Performance Spectrum

Core i9-14900F

24 / 32

46,825

0.0%

47,185

+0.8%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-14900F vs EPYC 4464P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-14900F vs EPYC 4464P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-14900F

2024

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4464P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (46,825 vs 47,185).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 4464P, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads and 28 PCIe lanes.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 89.4 vs 110.0 PassMark/$ ($524 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4464P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

EPYC 4464P

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads, plus 28 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅Costs $95 less on MSRP ($429 MSRP vs $524 MSRP).
✅Delivers 23.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 110.0 vs 89.4 PassMark/$ ($429 MSRP vs $524 MSRP).
✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 4464P better than Core i9-14900F?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 4464P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i9-14900F is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 4464P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 8.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 4464P is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 4464P is the better buy right now. EPYC 4464P comes in $95 cheaper on MSRP at $429 MSRP versus $524 MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 23.1% better value on MSRP (110.0 vs 89.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 4464P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 24 threads instead of 24/32. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i9-14900F vs EPYC 4464P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-14900F

The Core i9-14900F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5.6 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 46,825 points. Launch price was $524.

EPYC 4464P

The EPYC 4464P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 47,185 points. Launch price was $399.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-14900F packs 24 cores / 32 threads, while the EPYC 4464P offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Core i9-14900F has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.6 GHz on the Core i9-14900F versus 5.4 GHz on the EPYC 4464P — a 3.6% clock advantage for the Core i9-14900F (base: 2 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core i9-14900F uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 4464P uses Raphael (2023−2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-14900F scores 46,825 against the EPYC 4464P's 47,185 — a 0.8% lead for the EPYC 4464P. L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-14900F vs 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 4464P.

Feature	Core i9-14900F	EPYC 4464P
Cores / Threads	24 / 32+100%	12 / 24
Boost Clock	5.6 GHz+4%	5.4 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz	3.7 GHz+85%
L3 Cache	36 MB (total)+13%	32 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	5 nm-29%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)	Raphael (2023−2025)
PassMark	46,825	47,185
Cinebench R23 Multi	33,820	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-14900F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 4464P uses AM5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i9-14900F versus 5200 on the EPYC 4464P — the Core i9-14900F supports 7.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i9-14900F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-14900F) vs 28 (EPYC 4464P) — the EPYC 4464P offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: LGA1700 (Core i9-14900F) and AM5,FL1 (EPYC 4464P).

Feature	Core i9-14900F	EPYC 4464P
Socket	LGA1700	AM5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600+8%	5200
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB+50%	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	28+40%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the EPYC 4464P has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-14900F) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 4464P). The EPYC 4464P includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the Core i9-14900F requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 4464P rivals Core i9-13900.

Feature	Core i9-14900F	EPYC 4464P
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	AMD Radeon Graphics
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i9-14900F was priced at $524, while the EPYC 4464P came in at $429. On launch pricing ($524 vs $429), EPYC 4464P was $95 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-14900F delivers 89.4 pts/$ vs 110.0 pts/$ for the EPYC 4464P — making the EPYC 4464P the 20.7% better value option.

Feature	Core i9-14900F	EPYC 4464P
MSRP	$524	$429-18%
Performance per Dollar	89.4	110.0+23%
Release Date	2024	2024

Search Core i9-14900F on Amazon

Search EPYC 4464P on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.