Core i9-14900F
VS
EPYC 9115

Core i9-14900F vs EPYC 9115

Intel

Core i9-14900F

24 Cores32 Thrd65 WWMax: 5.6 GHz2024
VS
AMD

EPYC 9115

16 Cores32 Thrd125 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2024

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i9-14900F

#226
Core i5-14500T
MSRP: $232|Avg: $267
106%
#226
Ryzen 5 1600X
MSRP: $249|Avg: $144
65%
#227
Core i5-12600
MSRP: $233|Avg: $250
106%
#228
Core i7-11700T
MSRP: $323|Avg: $180
106%
#229
Core i5-10600
MSRP: $244|Avg: $159
106%
#230
Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
MSRP: $193|Avg: $100
105%
#231
Core i7-8700B
MSRP: $303|Avg: $139
105%
#232
Ryzen 3 2200G
MSRP: $99|Avg: $80
104%
#233
Core i3-9100F
MSRP: $97|Avg: $80
104%
#234
Ryzen 7 9800X3D
MSRP: $479|Avg: $479
103%
#235
Ryzen 9 3900XT
MSRP: $499|Avg: $390
103%
#236
Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G
MSRP: $176|Avg: $176
102%
#237
Core i7-14700T
MSRP: $384|Avg: $384
102%
#238
Core i3-13100TE
MSRP: $137|Avg: $137
102%
#239
Core i5-9600T
MSRP: $213|Avg: $118
101%
#240
Core i5-12400T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $192
100%
#241
Core i9-14900F
MSRP: $524|Avg: $579
100%
#242
Celeron G6900E
MSRP: $53|Avg: $53
100%
#243
Core i3-12300T
MSRP: $209|Avg: $164
99%
#244
Core i9-12900
MSRP: $519|Avg: $420
99%
#245
Ryzen 3 8300G
MSRP: $176|Avg: $176
99%
#246
Core i7-11700KF
MSRP: $374|Avg: $299
98%
#247
Core i5-10600K
MSRP: $262|Avg: $179
98%
#248
Core i3-10325
MSRP: $154|Avg: $130
98%
#249
Ryzen Embedded V2718
MSRP: $250|Avg: $200
98%
#250
Core i7-8086K
MSRP: $425|Avg: $178
98%
#251
Core i3-10300T
MSRP: $157|Avg: $100
97%
#252
Core i9-10900TE
MSRP: $309|Avg: $180
97%
#253
Core i9-12900T
MSRP: $489|Avg: $378
97%
#254
Core i5-12600T
MSRP: $223|Avg: $223
97%
#255
Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE
MSRP: $200|Avg: $180
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9115

#115
Xeon W-1370
MSRP: $323|Avg: $323
107%
#119
Xeon 6505P
MSRP: $563|Avg: $563
105%
#130
EPYC 9115
MSRP: $726|Avg: $726
100%
#131
EPYC 74F3
MSRP: $913|Avg: $824
100%
#143
Xeon W-1350P
MSRP: $311|Avg: $250
95%
#145
Xeon 6511P
MSRP: $815|Avg: $815
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($726) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The EPYC 9115 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightCore i9-14900FEPYC 9115
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($579)
⚠️ Higher cost ($726)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) / Intel 7 nm)
✨ Modern (Turin (2024) / 4 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i9-14900F ($579), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($147 less, 20% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightCore i9-14900FEPYC 9115
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+21%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($579)
⚠️ Higher cost ($726)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-14900F and EPYC 9115

Intel

Core i9-14900F

The Core i9-14900F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5.6 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 46,825 points. Launch price was $524.

AMD

EPYC 9115

The EPYC 9115 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 48,343 points. Launch price was $726.

Processing Power

The Core i9-14900F packs 24 cores / 32 threads, while the EPYC 9115 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Core i9-14900F has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.6 GHz on the Core i9-14900F versus 4.1 GHz on the EPYC 9115 — a 30.9% clock advantage for the Core i9-14900F (base: 2 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i9-14900F uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 9115 uses Turin (2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-14900F scores 46,825 against the EPYC 9115's 48,343 — a 3.2% lead for the EPYC 9115. L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-14900F vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 9115.

FeatureCore i9-14900FEPYC 9115
Cores / Threads
24 / 32+50%
16 / 32
Boost Clock
5.6 GHz+37%
4.1 GHz
Base Clock
2 GHz
2.6 GHz+30%
L3 Cache
36 MB (total)
64 MB (total)+78%
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)+100%
1 MB (per core)
Process
Intel 7 nm
4 nm-43%
Architecture
Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)
Turin (2024)
PassMark
46,825
48,343+3%
Cinebench R23 Multi
33,820
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-14900F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 9115 uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i9-14900F versus 4800 on the EPYC 9115 — the EPYC 9115 supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9115 supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 192 GB 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i9-14900F) vs 12 (EPYC 9115). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-14900F) vs 128 (EPYC 9115) — the EPYC 9115 offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: LGA1700 (Core i9-14900F) and SP5 (EPYC 9115).

FeatureCore i9-14900FEPYC 9115
Socket
LGA1700
SP5
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0
PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5600
4800+95900%
Max RAM Capacity
192 GB+3276700%
6144
RAM Channels
2
12+500%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
20
128+540%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-14900F) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 9115). Direct competitor: EPYC 9115 rivals Xeon Platinum 8468X.

FeatureCore i9-14900FEPYC 9115
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i9-14900F launched at $524 MSRP, while the EPYC 9115 debuted at $726. At current prices ($579 vs $726), the Core i9-14900F is $147 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-14900F delivers 80.9 pts/$ vs 66.6 pts/$ for the EPYC 9115 — making the Core i9-14900F the 19.4% better value option.

FeatureCore i9-14900FEPYC 9115
MSRP
$524-28%
$726
Avg Price (30d)
$579-20%
$726
Performance per Dollar
80.9+21%
66.6
Release Date
2024
2024