Core i9-14900F vs EPYC 73F3
Core i9-14900F
EPYC 73F3
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i9-14900F
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 73F3
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i9-14900F | EPYC 73F3 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($579) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($2,100) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) / Intel 7 nm) | ✨ Modern (Milan (2021−2023) / 7 nm+) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i9-14900F | EPYC 73F3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+268%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($579) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($2,100) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-14900F and EPYC 73F3
Core i9-14900F
The Core i9-14900F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5.6 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 46,825 points. Launch price was $524.
EPYC 73F3
The EPYC 73F3 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 240 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 46,103 points. Launch price was $3,521.
Processing Power
The Core i9-14900F packs 24 cores / 32 threads, while the EPYC 73F3 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Core i9-14900F has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.6 GHz on the Core i9-14900F versus 4 GHz on the EPYC 73F3 — a 33.3% clock advantage for the Core i9-14900F (base: 2 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i9-14900F uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 73F3 uses Milan (2021−2023) (7 nm+). In PassMark, the Core i9-14900F scores 46,825 against the EPYC 73F3's 46,103 — a 1.6% lead for the Core i9-14900F. L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-14900F vs 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 73F3.
| Feature | Core i9-14900F | EPYC 73F3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 32+50% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 5.6 GHz+40% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 3.5 GHz+75% |
| L3 Cache | 36 MB (total) | 256 MB (total)+611% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+300% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 7 nm+ |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) | Milan (2021−2023) |
| PassMark | 46,825+2% | 46,103 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 33,820 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-14900F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 73F3 uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i9-14900F versus 3200 on the EPYC 73F3 — the EPYC 73F3 supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 73F3 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 192 GB — 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i9-14900F) vs 8 (EPYC 73F3). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-14900F) vs 128 (EPYC 73F3) — the EPYC 73F3 offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: LGA1700 (Core i9-14900F) and SP3,C621A (EPYC 73F3).
| Feature | Core i9-14900F | EPYC 73F3 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | SP3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | 3200+63900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+4915100% | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 128+540% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 73F3 rivals Xeon Platinum 8362.
| Feature | Core i9-14900F | EPYC 73F3 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The Core i9-14900F launched at $524 MSRP, while the EPYC 73F3 debuted at $3521. At current prices ($579 vs $2100), the Core i9-14900F is $1521 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-14900F delivers 80.9 pts/$ vs 22.0 pts/$ for the EPYC 73F3 — making the Core i9-14900F the 114.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-14900F | EPYC 73F3 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $524-85% | $3521 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $579-72% | $2100 |
| Performance per Dollar | 80.9+268% | 22.0 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2021 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i9-14900F and EPYC 73F3
