Ryzen 9 7900X
VS
EPYC 9174F

Ryzen 9 7900X vs EPYC 9174F

AMD

Ryzen 9 7900X

12 Cores24 Thrd170 WWMax: 5.6 GHz2022
VS
AMD

EPYC 9174F

16 Cores32 Thrd320 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2022

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 9 7900X

#23
Ryzen 5 5600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $115
115%
#24
Celeron G5925
MSRP: $62|Avg: $15
115%
#25
Ryzen 5 7500F
MSRP: $179|Avg: $145
113%
#26
Core Ultra 5 245
MSRP: $319|Avg: $220
112%
#27
Ryzen 7 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $86
112%
#28
Core Ultra 7 265KF
MSRP: $379|Avg: $323
112%
#29
Core Ultra 7 265F
MSRP: $369|Avg: $276
110%
#30
Core i5-12400F
MSRP: $174|Avg: $110
109%
#31
Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G
MSRP: $130|Avg: $80
108%
#32
Ryzen 7 2700X
MSRP: $329|Avg: $100
107%
#33
Core i3-10100F
MSRP: $88|Avg: $50
107%
#34
Ryzen 5 7400F
MSRP: $150|Avg: $147
107%
#35
Ryzen 5 9600X
MSRP: $279|Avg: $178
104%
#36
Ryzen 7 3800X
MSRP: $399|Avg: $140
101%
#37
Ryzen 3 5300G
MSRP: $130|Avg: $80
100%
#38
Ryzen 9 7900X
MSRP: $549|Avg: $316
100%
#39
Ryzen 5 5600X
MSRP: $299|Avg: $135
100%
#40
Core i5-14600KF
MSRP: $304|Avg: $239
100%
#41
Ryzen 7 5800
MSRP: $349|Avg: $160
99%
#42
Core i3-14100F
MSRP: $109|Avg: $96
99%
#43
Ryzen 7 3700X
MSRP: $329|Avg: $140
99%
#44
Ryzen 5 7600X
MSRP: $299|Avg: $178
98%
#45
Ryzen 3 3100
MSRP: $99|Avg: $75
98%
#46
Core i5-13490F
MSRP: $235|Avg: $170
97%
#47
Ryzen 5 5600F
MSRP: $99|Avg: $129
97%
#48
Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
MSRP: $499|Avg: $200
96%
#49
Ryzen 3 4300GE
MSRP: $94|Avg: $72
96%
#50
Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE
MSRP: $169|Avg: $50
96%
#51
Core Ultra 5 225
MSRP: $240|Avg: $200
96%
#52
Core i5-11500
MSRP: $192|Avg: $110
96%
#53
Core i3-12100F
MSRP: $97|Avg: $90
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9174F

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
772%
#1
Core i9-9990XE
MSRP: $2000|Avg: N/A
6%
#2
Xeon W-11855M
MSRP: $450|Avg: $200
14%
#3
Xeon W-11955M
MSRP: $623|Avg: $450
13%
#4
Xeon W-11865MLE
MSRP: $467|Avg: $350
13%
#5
Xeon W-11865MRE
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
12%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
146%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
129%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
100%
#16
EPYC 7302
MSRP: $978|Avg: $109
100%
#21
Xeon Platinum 8260M
MSRP: $7705|Avg: N/A
91%
#22
Xeon Platinum 8268
MSRP: $6302|Avg: N/A
90%
#24
Xeon Gold 6130H
MSRP: $1894|Avg: N/A
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($30) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The EPYC 9174F is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightRyzen 9 7900XEPYC 9174F
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($316)
More affordable ($30)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) / 5 nm)
✨ Modern (Genoa (2022−2023) / 5 nm, 6 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Ryzen 9 7900X ($316), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($286 less, 953% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightRyzen 9 7900XEPYC 9174F
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+972%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($316)
More affordable ($30)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 7900X and EPYC 9174F

AMD

Ryzen 9 7900X

The Ryzen 9 7900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-09-27. It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 4.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.6 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 51,329 points. Launch price was $549.

AMD

EPYC 9174F

The EPYC 9174F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 52,249 points. Launch price was $3,850.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 9 7900X packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the EPYC 9174F offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 9174F has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.6 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7900X versus 4.4 GHz on the EPYC 9174F — a 24% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7900X (base: 4.7 GHz vs 4.1 GHz). The Ryzen 9 7900X uses the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm), while the EPYC 9174F uses Genoa (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 7900X scores 51,329 against the EPYC 9174F's 52,249 — a 1.8% lead for the EPYC 9174F. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7900X vs 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9174F.

FeatureRyzen 9 7900XEPYC 9174F
Cores / Threads
12 / 24
16 / 32+33%
Boost Clock
5.6 GHz+27%
4.4 GHz
Base Clock
4.7 GHz+15%
4.1 GHz
L3 Cache
64 MB (total)
256 MB (total)+300%
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
1 MB (per core)
Process
5 nm
5 nm, 6 nm
Architecture
Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023)
Genoa (2022−2023)
PassMark
51,329
52,249+2%
Cinebench R23 Multi
29,557
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 9 7900X uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 9174F uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 9 7900X versus 4800 on the EPYC 9174F — the EPYC 9174F supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9174F supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 128 GB 191.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 7900X) vs 12 (EPYC 9174F). PCIe lanes: 28 (Ryzen 9 7900X) vs 128 (EPYC 9174F) — the EPYC 9174F offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM5 (Ryzen 9 7900X) and SP5 (EPYC 9174F).

FeatureRyzen 9 7900XEPYC 9174F
Socket
AM5
SP5
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0
PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5200
4800+95900%
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB+2184433%
6144
RAM Channels
2
12+500%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
28
128+357%
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 9 7900X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 7900X) vs VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 9174F). The Ryzen 9 7900X includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the EPYC 9174F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 7900X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 7900X rivals Core i9-13900K; EPYC 9174F rivals Xeon Platinum 8468.

FeatureRyzen 9 7900XEPYC 9174F
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Radeon Graphics
None
Unlocked
Yes
No
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Gaming
💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 9 7900X launched at $549 MSRP, while the EPYC 9174F debuted at $194. At current prices ($316 vs $30), the EPYC 9174F is $286 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 9 7900X delivers 162.4 pts/$ vs 1741.6 pts/$ for the EPYC 9174F — making the EPYC 9174F the 165.9% better value option.

FeatureRyzen 9 7900XEPYC 9174F
MSRP
$549
$194-65%
Avg Price (30d)
$316
$30-91%
Performance per Dollar
162.4
1741.6+972%
Release Date
2022
2022