
Ryzen 5 5500
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 7940HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 5500
2022Why buy it
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7940HS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,311 vs 29,986).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $159 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 7940HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 7940HS moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Ryzen 9 7940HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +43.8% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Ryzen 5 5500 needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Ryzen 5 5500.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Ryzen 5 5500
2022Ryzen 9 7940HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +43.8% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Ryzen 5 5500 needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Ryzen 5 5500.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7940HS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,311 vs 29,986).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $159 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 7940HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 7940HS moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 7940HS better than Ryzen 5 5500?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5500 | Ryzen 9 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 267 FPS |
| medium | 150 FPS | 242 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 203 FPS |
| ultra | 97 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 235 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 92 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5500 | Ryzen 9 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 329 FPS | 497 FPS |
| medium | 285 FPS | 408 FPS |
| high | 254 FPS | 349 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 311 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 291 FPS | 434 FPS |
| medium | 258 FPS | 376 FPS |
| high | 233 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 274 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 229 FPS | 286 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 189 FPS | 243 FPS |
| ultra | 162 FPS | 209 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5500 | Ryzen 9 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 483 FPS | 750 FPS |
| medium | 483 FPS | 750 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 730 FPS |
| ultra | 406 FPS | 624 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 483 FPS | 750 FPS |
| medium | 411 FPS | 646 FPS |
| high | 361 FPS | 545 FPS |
| ultra | 300 FPS | 467 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 544 FPS |
| medium | 285 FPS | 475 FPS |
| high | 248 FPS | 422 FPS |
| ultra | 192 FPS | 357 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5500 | Ryzen 9 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 483 FPS | 750 FPS |
| medium | 483 FPS | 750 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 750 FPS |
| ultra | 483 FPS | 750 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 483 FPS | 750 FPS |
| medium | 483 FPS | 750 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 658 FPS |
| ultra | 425 FPS | 573 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 448 FPS | 574 FPS |
| medium | 404 FPS | 511 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 456 FPS |
| ultra | 308 FPS | 394 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 5500 and Ryzen 9 7940HS


Ryzen 5 5500
Ryzen 5 5500
The Ryzen 5 5500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Cezanne (2021−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,311 points. Launch price was $159.


Ryzen 9 7940HS
Ryzen 9 7940HS
The Ryzen 9 7940HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 29,986 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 5500 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 9 7940HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 9 7940HS has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5500 versus 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7940HS — a 21.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7940HS (base: 3.6 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Ryzen 5 5500 uses the Cezanne (2021−2025) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen 9 7940HS uses Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 5500 scores 19,311 against the Ryzen 9 7940HS's 29,986 — a 43.3% lead for the Ryzen 9 7940HS. L3 cache: 16 MB on the Ryzen 5 5500 vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7940HS.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5500 | Ryzen 9 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz | 5.2 GHz+24% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz | 4 GHz+11% |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Cezanne (2021−2025) | Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) |
| PassMark | 19,311 | 29,986+55% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 17,443 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,646 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 11,591 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 5500 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 9 7940HS uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 5500 versus DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 9 7940HS — the Ryzen 9 7940HS supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 9 7940HS supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 5 5500) vs 20 (Ryzen 9 7940HS) — the Ryzen 5 5500 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series (Ryzen 5 5500) and FP8,FP7 (Ryzen 9 7940HS).
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5500 | Ryzen 9 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-5600+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 256 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24+20% | 20 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen 9 7940HS supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support AMD-V virtualization. The Ryzen 9 7940HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon 780M), while the Ryzen 5 5500 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5500 targets Desktop, Ryzen 9 7940HS targets Thin-and-light Performance. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 7940HS rivals Core i9-13900H.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5500 | Ryzen 9 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon 780M |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Desktop | Thin-and-light Performance |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












