Ryzen 9 9900X
Xeon w5-3535X
Ryzen 9 9900X vs Xeon w5-3535X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 9 9900X vs Xeon w5-3535X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 9 9900X vs Xeon w5-3535X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 9 9900X
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+21.9% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 53 MB).
- ✅Costs $1,200 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $1,699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 234.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 109.3 vs 32.7 PassMark/$ ($499 MSRP vs $1,699 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 300W, a 180W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (19,756 vs 30,000).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon w5-3535X, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads and 112 PCIe lanes.
Xeon w5-3535X
2024Why buy it
- ✅+51.9% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads, plus 112 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅366.7% more PCIe lanes (112 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 9900X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (53 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 32.7 vs 109.3 PassMark/$ ($1,699 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ❌150% higher power demand at 300W vs 120W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 9900X can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 9900X better than Xeon w5-3535X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 9 9900X vs Xeon w5-3535X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Ryzen 9 9900X
The Ryzen 9 9900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Granite Ridge (2024−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.6 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 54,530 points. Launch price was $499.
Xeon w5-3535X
The Xeon w5-3535X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 52.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 300 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 55,532 points. Launch price was $1,689.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 9900X packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon w5-3535X offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon w5-3535X has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.6 GHz on the Ryzen 9 9900X versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w5-3535X — a 15.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 9900X (base: 4.4 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Ryzen 9 9900X uses the Granite Ridge (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon w5-3535X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 9900X scores 54,530 against the Xeon w5-3535X's 55,532 — a 1.8% lead for the Xeon w5-3535X. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 3,401 vs 2,300, a 38.6% lead for the Ryzen 9 9900X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 19,756 vs 30,000 (41.2% advantage for the Xeon w5-3535X). L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 9900X vs 52.5 MB on the Xeon w5-3535X.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 9900X | Xeon w5-3535X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24 | 20 / 40+67% |
| Boost Clock | 5.6 GHz+17% | 4.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.4 GHz+52% | 2.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total)+22% | 52.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 4 nm-43% | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Granite Ridge (2024−2025) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 54,530 | 55,532+2% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 33,003 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 3,401+48% | 2,300 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 19,756 | 30,000+52% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 9900X uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon w5-3535X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 9 9900X versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon w5-3535X — the Ryzen 9 9900X supports 16.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon w5-3535X supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 9900X) vs 4 (Xeon w5-3535X). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 9 9900X) vs 112 (Xeon w5-3535X) — the Xeon w5-3535X offers 88 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A620,B650,X670,X870 (Ryzen 9 9900X) and W790 (Xeon w5-3535X).
| Feature | Ryzen 9 9900X | Xeon w5-3535X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600+17% | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB | 4096 GB+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 112+367% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 9900X) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon w5-3535X). The Ryzen 9 9900X includes integrated graphics (Radeon 610M), while the Xeon w5-3535X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon w5-3535X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon w5-3535X rivals Threadripper PRO 7965WX.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 9900X | Xeon w5-3535X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon 610M | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Workstation |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen 9 9900X was priced at $499, while the Xeon w5-3535X came in at $1699. On launch pricing ($499 vs $1699), Ryzen 9 9900X was $1200 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 9 9900X delivers 109.3 pts/$ vs 32.7 pts/$ for the Xeon w5-3535X — making the Ryzen 9 9900X the 107.9% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 9900X | Xeon w5-3535X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499-71% | $1699 |
| Performance per Dollar | 109.3+234% | 32.7 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2024 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen 9 9900X and Xeon w5-3535X
