
Ryzen 9 9950X3D
Popular choices:

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 9 9950X3D
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,700 less on MSRP ($699 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 261.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 100.4 vs 27.8 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 170W instead of 280W, a 110W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics (2 Cores), while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (44,500 vs 45,000).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 27.8 vs 100.4 PassMark/$ ($2,399 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ❌64.7% higher power demand at 280W vs 170W.
- ❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 9950X3D moves to AM5 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 9950X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 9 9950X3D
2025Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,700 less on MSRP ($699 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 261.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 100.4 vs 27.8 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 170W instead of 280W, a 110W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics (2 Cores), while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (44,500 vs 45,000).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 27.8 vs 100.4 PassMark/$ ($2,399 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ❌64.7% higher power demand at 280W vs 170W.
- ❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 9950X3D moves to AM5 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 9950X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX better than Ryzen 9 9950X3D?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 9950X3D | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 300 FPS | 224 FPS |
| medium | 274 FPS | 184 FPS |
| high | 227 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 191 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 276 FPS | 194 FPS |
| medium | 228 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 177 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 190 FPS | 94 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 63 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 51 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 9950X3D | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 722 FPS | 806 FPS |
| medium | 615 FPS | 684 FPS |
| high | 457 FPS | 535 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 464 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 591 FPS | 655 FPS |
| medium | 524 FPS | 569 FPS |
| high | 405 FPS | 465 FPS |
| ultra | 319 FPS | 378 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 332 FPS | 383 FPS |
| medium | 299 FPS | 335 FPS |
| high | 262 FPS | 300 FPS |
| ultra | 224 FPS | 265 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 9 9950X3D | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 893 FPS | 812 FPS |
| medium | 725 FPS | 680 FPS |
| high | 652 FPS | 620 FPS |
| ultra | 560 FPS | 540 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 720 FPS | 622 FPS |
| medium | 585 FPS | 521 FPS |
| high | 514 FPS | 470 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 405 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 516 FPS | 451 FPS |
| medium | 431 FPS | 360 FPS |
| high | 387 FPS | 326 FPS |
| ultra | 322 FPS | 259 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 9 9950X3D | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1116 FPS | 1215 FPS |
| medium | 1001 FPS | 1015 FPS |
| high | 878 FPS | 926 FPS |
| ultra | 792 FPS | 820 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 872 FPS | 951 FPS |
| medium | 766 FPS | 828 FPS |
| high | 673 FPS | 715 FPS |
| ultra | 584 FPS | 611 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 637 FPS | 674 FPS |
| medium | 566 FPS | 605 FPS |
| high | 503 FPS | 529 FPS |
| ultra | 435 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 9950X3D and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX


Ryzen 9 9950X3D
Ryzen 9 9950X3D
The Ryzen 9 9950X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Ridge (2024−2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 70,177 points. Launch price was $699.


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-08. It is based on the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 66,614 points. Launch price was $2,399.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 9950X3D packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 9950X3D versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX — a 23.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 9950X3D (base: 4.3 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Ryzen 9 9950X3D uses the Granite Ridge (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX uses Chagall PRO (2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 9950X3D scores 70,177 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX's 66,614 — a 5.2% lead for the Ryzen 9 9950X3D. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 44,500 vs 45,000 (1.1% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 3,398 vs 1,550, a 74.7% lead for the Ryzen 9 9950X3D that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 22,206 vs 15,500 (35.6% advantage for the Ryzen 9 9950X3D). L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 9950X3D vs 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 9950X3D | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 24 / 48+50% |
| Boost Clock | 5.7 GHz+27% | 4.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.3 GHz+13% | 3.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total) | 128 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-43% | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Granite Ridge (2024−2025) | Chagall PRO (2022) |
| PassMark | 70,177+5% | 66,614 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 44,500 | 45,000+1% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 3,398+119% | 1,550 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 22,206+43% | 15,500 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 9950X3D uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 9 9950X3D versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX — the Ryzen 9 9950X3D supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 165.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 9950X3D) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 9 9950X3D) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X670E,X670,B650E,B650 (Ryzen 9 9950X3D) and WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX).
| Feature | Ryzen 9 9950X3D | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | sWRX8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600+25% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 2048 GB+967% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 128+433% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen 9 9950X3D supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Ryzen 9 9950X3D) vs AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX). The Ryzen 9 9950X3D includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics (2 Cores)), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX targets Professional Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 9950X3D rivals Core Ultra 9 285K; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX rivals Xeon Gold 6430.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 9950X3D | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Graphics (2 Cores) | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | true | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Professional Workstation |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 9 9950X3D launched at $699 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX debuted at $2399. On MSRP ($699 vs $2399), the Ryzen 9 9950X3D is $1700 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 9 9950X3D delivers 100.4 pts/$ vs 27.8 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX — making the Ryzen 9 9950X3D the 113.3% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 9950X3D | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $699-71% | $2399 |
| Performance per Dollar | 100.4+261% | 27.8 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












